Nice to see everything getting more and more Canadian.
I was laid off and haven't found work yet
I was laid off and found new employment in the same industry
I was laid off and found new employment in a different industry
I survived the downturn with the same company
I quit my job and went elsewhere (expand in comments)
It's not over. We're all fucked, me included!
other
Nice to see everything getting more and more Canadian.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Is it though? It's kind of scary how global companies are pulling out of Canada. Hopefully it's not a sinking ship scenario.Originally posted by ExtraSlow
Nice to see everything getting more and more Canadian.
Unfortunately, that's my way of thinking too.Originally posted by vw_rabbit2.5
Is it though? It's kind of scary how global companies are pulling out of Canada. Hopefully it's not a sinking ship scenario.
Originally posted by vw_rabbit2.5
Is it though? It's kind of scary how global companies are pulling out of Canada. Hopefully it's not a sinking ship scenario.
The reality is, it is a sinking ship.
Given our current political climate, Canada, let alone Alberta, are no longer economical places to do business.
With Trump essentially saying "LETS DO THIS!!!" We will see more investment leave Canada and shift to other markets leaving us in the dust.
I hate to say it, but all the environmentalist nut swingers have won.
Until we see a fundamental change in attitude and political spectrum, this will be the new norm.
We bitch and moan when foreign companies buy our natural resources (remember Nexen and Talisman?) Why wouldn't we cheer when those same multinationals sell them back to us?
I know we're all pretty depressed about the political situation in this province and country, but let's have some perspective.
As the old guys at CNRL always told me, "the assets will end up in the hands of the lowest cost operator over time". Seems to be true for these two blockbuster transactions.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hah Cenovus is a "low cost operator"?
Z32 TT
1996 Integra - winter beater with studs - RIP (deer)
2002 WRX - to be sold
2010 sti - winter
Well compared to conoco...
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by g-m
Hah Cenovus is a "low cost operator"?
I went to a meeting at conoco and they had a moderator, seriously, the guys job was to keep meetings moving and on track. it was awesome.Originally posted by killramos
Well compared to conoco...
Fuck thats not a bad idea considering some of the meetings iv attended at actual low cost producersOriginally posted by dirtsniffer
I went to a meeting at conoco and they had a moderator, seriously, the guys job was to keep meetings moving and on track. it was awesome.
That sounds amazing.Originally posted by dirtsniffer
I went to a meeting at conoco and they had a moderator, seriously, the guys job was to keep meetings moving and on track. it was awesome.
Look at the published cost per barrel of various SAGD projects. Several of the CVE projects are right at the low end of that scale. That makes them "low cost" to me.
What metric do you guys use to say that they aren't?
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
And the stock tanks over 10% as a result.Originally posted by gkAeris
welp, news release.........
http://business.financialpost.com/ne...e-17-7-billion
.........
Wonder if they are going close the Canadian locations for conoco?
interesting comparing this vs. the Shell/CNRL deal.Originally posted by sputnik
And the stock tanks over 10% as a result.
With the Shell/CNRL deal, Shell stock dropped while CNRL went up indicating that CNRL got a good deal.
But with this one it's the opposite, makes it seem like Cenovus overpaid.
It's difficult to comment on the stock movements...Originally posted by sabad66
interesting comparing this vs. the Shell/CNRL deal.
With the Shell/CNRL deal, Shell stock dropped while CNRL went up indicating that CNRL got a good deal.
But with this one it's the opposite, makes it seem like Cenovus overpaid.
Albertans have a feeling "things will get better" when there's a political shift, and when the price of oil goes up.
The "international" stock traders look at this differently. They know our federal government has a hate on for oil, and all the other environmental jazz (carbon tax, etc...).
International owners of the stock would look at this as if they purchased assets in an environment that's going down the drain, where one day the asset might be worth little to no value.
I'm not saying I'm right 100%, but I do think this plays in to factor with everything.
Depends on how much of the stock is owned by local vs international.
Also stock will be performing better for companies that have assets abroad, stocks will be lower and performing worse for those companies who's assets are focused on a specific region, especially Alberta (because of how shitty it is here, risky risky risky).
There's probably a million other reasons to, but this is just what comes to mind.
Last edited by Zhariak; 03-30-2017 at 12:55 PM.
Sig was pwned by Moderator!
Well Cenovus is issuing close to 400 million shares (~200 to Conoco and ~200 to the market) for this deal. That's 50% more shares than now.Originally posted by sabad66
interesting comparing this vs. the Shell/CNRL deal.
With the Shell/CNRL deal, Shell stock dropped while CNRL went up indicating that CNRL got a good deal.
But with this one it's the opposite, makes it seem like Cenovus overpaid.
The bought deal was also at $16.
CNRL hasn't announced any share issue yet.
CNRL issued shares...Shell essentially owns 9%-10% of CNRL now.Originally posted by realazy
Well Cenovus is issuing close to 400 million shares (~200 to Conoco and ~200 to the market) for this deal. That's 50% more shares than now.
The bought deal was also at $16.
CNRL hasn't announced any share issue yet.
Cenovus is horribly over staffed and inefficient but Conoco was a whole different level of stupidity. They start meetings off with "safety moments" regardless of who is attending, have moderators (as mentioned above) and had 3-5 staff vs 1 at a comparable company before layoffs and even now I would says it's 2 to 1.Originally posted by g-m
Hah Cenovus is a "low cost operator"?
I stand corrected, that's still only 10% dilution vs. 50%.Originally posted by Type_S1
CNRL issued shares...Shell essentially owns 9%-10% of CNRL now.