So good! And I wouldn’t mind it at all. App and done hahaThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So good! And I wouldn’t mind it at all. App and done hahaThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
how else are they going to locate more morning regret accusers if they dont advetrise he's fair game for metooThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That is the sad reality, and perhaps more importantly it cheapens the accusations of the real victims (not saying she isn't, it's just not yet proven either way) which is the other big issue. Many of these cases seem to be he-said-she-said, with the side effect of destroying the accused's life, family, and career without any evidence.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
^ 100%
Thanks to social media, we have regressed 200 years and back to mob lynchingThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So the authorities almost took 4 months to lay charges on this case. Authorities denying that Noble’s notoriety didn’t play a factor in the investigation or charges. I find it hard to believe. If it was Joe they would have laid the charges in a flash.
However the fact that they charged a well known person means there has to be some truth to this case. Only time will tell.
or they would have laid no charges if it was a nobody if you read the "person with authority" trashThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sad and true, this is modern day salem witch hunting. His reputation is beyond tarnished even if hes innocentThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Incorrect. They would have laid charges, they just wouldn't be as prominent in the media. As the owner, he is technically the boss for everyone who works there, hence the "Person of authority." That makes it a bigger deal because they have, in essence, the ability to fire someone if they don't do what the person wants or be treated differently because they declined/accepted advances from that person.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Either way, there is no "Innocent until proven Guilty" in the court of public opinion, and I firmly believe that the media should stay out of court/police business unless there is an actual threat to the public, or the case has been closed and trial is over.
“Wrongful termination” little different when everyone is an adult... the wording makes it sound like statutory rapeThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
BS. no such thing as a restaruant owner as a "person of trust/authority" when it comes to adults. That's for kids. read up on it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
- - - Updated - - -
EXACTLY. the cops are over stepping this one, hence why it would easily be tossed in the real world, unless he gets railroaded as part of this meetoo shit, in that fantasy world, anything goes.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The fact that Sexual Assault is such a wide range of things, just like Rage2 alluded to earlier is part of the problem. When 80% of people hear sexual assault they hear "Dragged into the bushes and raped someone," and that is simply not the case. I think at one point the Criminal Code of Canada had it split up into different things, kind of how the states has it, but it got brought together around that one umbrella. I could be wrong on that though.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
A Wrongful termination is a whole other legal thing, but hypothetically if I had people that worked for me that didn't put out for me I could phase them out over time with poorer and poorer performance reviews until I had actual grounds to terminate. Then it wouldn't be wrongful termination, since there is a paper trail, made up or otherwise, that supports the firing.
Don't get trapped into "debating" anything with the least knowledgeable, most opinionated troll account on Beyond.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by SJW
Once again another useless post by JRSCOOLDUDE.
Originally posted by snowcat
Don't let the e-thugs and faggots get to you when they quote your posts and write stupid shit.^^ Fact CheckedOriginally posted by JRSC00LUDE
I say stupid shit all the time.
Care to fill us in on the details of this? You’re sure talking shit like you know what’s up with this, so by all means, let’s hear it bud.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
- - - Updated - - -
Haha, it was an observation. There is nothing to debate about it, lol!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
---------------------------------------------------
Any writings in this forum are my personal view and all opinions expressed should be taken as such; there is no implied or direct opinion representative of anything but my own thoughts on various subjects.
authority in the legal code only comes into play with statutory rape as was already pointed out. The police are making stuff up here, with 2 adults to fit the meetoo agenda. not that a restaurant owner would ever be seen as an authority either.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Statutory Rape does not exist in the Criminal Code of Canada.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
lolThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Call it whatever you want, but it absolutely exiats.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Canada's age of consent. The age of consent to sexual activity is 16 years. In some cases, the age of consent is higher (for example, when there is a relationship of trust, authority or dependency). In other words, a person must be at least 16 years old to be able to legally agree to sexual activity.
A 16 or 17 year old cannot consent to sexual activity if:
their sexual partner is in position of trust or authority towards them, for example their teacher or coach
the young person is dependent on their sexual partner, for example for care or support
the relationship between the young person and their sexual partner is exploitative
Over 17 there is no trust/boss clause.
It's a wonder you are able to draw breath and so proudly waste oxygen every morning
Z32 TT
1996 Integra - winter beater with studs - RIP (deer)
2002 WRX - to be sold
2010 sti - winter