Most service companies are feast or famine.
Producers have a pretty steady salary so when the service company jacks their rates way up based on demand they can afford to pay the increase.
Most service companies are feast or famine.
Producers have a pretty steady salary so when the service company jacks their rates way up based on demand they can afford to pay the increase.
I am sure this is what you mean, Extraslow, when you say you've got your answer because this is pretty much the range of my entire friend group who work at producers. Everyone has 5-8 years experience and their base salaries falls within this range depending on role and producer. To narrow the range a little more I'd even say 95-110k if you've got a proven track record of producing good work with little to no supervision. As you mentioned all of the other benefits vary greatly but for base pay this gets you right in the pocket.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by schurchill39; 08-15-2018 at 06:08 PM.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteOriginally Posted by SugarphreakThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Dang, I thought engineers at E&Ps made way more then what ppl are posting here, but I've only worked on the service/technology/sales side (13 yrs same company).
Current Cars:
2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L
Past Cars:
1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
1989 5L Mustang
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda
Sales is where the big money is. Well , during good years E&P shares paid out a hell of a lot, but nobody makes money on those these days.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I know several people who weren't laid off and continued working with the producer company, easily making $120k-$150k with with 6-8 years exp. It's all the people who've been laid off and getting that post-recession salary. I'd say 5-7 years you should expect 80-100k, any contractor company it could be as low as 65kThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Base salary isn't going to be hugely different between companies. What I found can vary big time is all the other perks, long term, short term, bonuses that can add significantly to the base salary each year.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If you are talking base salary, that's an outlier, well above average for that age range.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Yeah, long term incentive can be very significant if your company is hitting it's targets. Oh how I miss those days. . . .This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Ya, I think dandia is talking about total or something. No way someone is getting $150k base with that total experience level.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
With that said, the ranges can be pretty crazy if we are not talking about base simply due to all the variables involved.
I learned the exact same thing in this thread haha - I thought PEng's at producers with that much experience were making way more (base salary) than is suggested here.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://go.hays.ca/rs/855-IQZ-733/im...de-digital.pdf
Resources and Mining starts at Page 168
At 5-7 years, you have been a P.Eng for 1-3 years. That's not what I would call huge experience. It is at P.Eng level that at a lot of producers you can start to get extras. Again at Intermediate and Senior levels things change as you get more perks. At leadership levels again things change, the higher up the ladder you go the less the base salary means in terms of your total compensation.
Not sure why you would think that. Most people at this experience level just begin knowing what they are really doing. However, the total compensation is often times very different from base, which is why I mentioned how base really varies greatly from total.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I have seen total compensation for field engineers over $200k for someone with 7-8 years experience.
yeah this was total compensation w/ bonus. should have clarified.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
these are big producer companies, a bunch of them did an anonymous survey out to each other.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I would be cautious about using this as a credible representation of market data. Hays surveys are not commonly used by Calgary E&P companies, and most of their data is likely sourced from their recruitment side and bulked up with regional differentials, which provides a pretty small data set.
Originally posted by arian_ma
your stomach is full of sulfuric acid
Well im in IT and from my point of view those salaries in the survey for IT especially for network positions havent changed in 10 years. I wonder if this is how Telus keeps their employees at the same level for years (imho as a ex telus employee)
I had nothing to go off of except my own assumptions and how much schooling they do vs some other O&G jobs My engineering friends worked WAY harder in school than myself or my other non-engineer friends, I assumed they were compensated better than that (not that it's bad). I don't ask them what they make. At least one other person in this thread learned the same thing today haha. For whatever reason I've always thought engineers (and my only experience is primarily with producers) were compensated better than that. I had assumed the moment you get that PEng designation you would be at $100K++, I really had no idea.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
As for the rest of the compensation as far as I know it's often the same company-wide, like STIP, LTIP, benefits, etc. which can be very significant but AFAIK is not normally specific to engineers or any other department for that matter (outside of execs). Every producer I've worked for has had a fairly consistent bonus/benefit plan across departments. Every bonus I've ever got has been a salary percentage, so people who make more naturally get bonused more.
For every peng making bank, there are 9 others making under 6 figures. The thing is, you dont hear from those 9 others, and they sure don't take salary surveys (which rarely get info from smaller companies).
STIP and LTIP can be good but the share price needs to go up. This is not happening as large investments into Canadian Energy isn't happening.
Look at the news on Billionaire family and their investment into energy. Where did it go? Chevron, Devon, etc.... all Int'l or US energy.
In a smaller company it's more about hitting the right time of the price cycle.
Yeah, I'd say average engineers don't make nearly what people assume. Lots under 100k, even experienced ones.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
...
Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-18-2019 at 02:01 PM.