Let me reiterate that I don't think it has zero impact. I just feel that it isn't the problem in the first place that the big business of vaccinations is attempting to convince us it is. I have no issue with anyone who wants to participate. I just have an issue with being told you must participate when I believe the consequences of not doing so to be of no overall consequence to the human experience.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Shit, if we believe that everything science says should dictate how we live our lives then we should be allowing the genetically weak to die off rather than letting them pollute the human race with inferior genes making us all eventually weak. We all know that the earth is going to be overpopulated one day so why do we choose to inject morality into science in one area (saying it is our civic duty to care for those that would not survive naturally) but reject it in another (allowing ourselves to become weaker over generations and overpopulated causing other horrific things to happen to us). Please don't think I am advocating these thoughts. I am just speaking to the extreme for effect. My point is that where one chooses to accept the moral reasons to do something is a sliding scale. Where one chooses to accept risk to ones own self and situation is the only valid argument here IMHO. It is the trying to make others feel bad for not subscribing to the propaganda making us bad human being where I really have an issue