Fair enough, but what I’m saying is that isn’t enough and therefore isn’t as prone to abuse as you may think. There has to be more to gain the objective part of those grounds. We have to do more to verify that instead of taking someone’s word on face value. If we did that with everything, everyone would be a criminal.
Identity of the driver is absolutely critical when it comes to conducting impaired investigations post driving. It’s no different than any other criminal investigation. You need reasonable grounds to believe that specific person was involved in an offense, both in their identity and the information about the offense being committed.
I’m absolutely sure this part of the law isn’t as big of a thing as it’s being made out to be. It’s way more protected from abuse than people think, both in case law and the actual law itself. At least in my opinion, for whatever that’s worth, hah!
---------------------------------------------------
Any writings in this forum are my personal view and all opinions expressed should be taken as such; there is no implied or direct opinion representative of anything but my own thoughts on various subjects.