Barr has said he might not even make it public, so it might be a while until that is challenged and the results surface.
Also keep in mind the scope of the investigation was specifically surrounding the Russian collusion in the 2016 election - the dozens of other crimes they uncovered along the way are being/have been handed off to SDNY and others, and will probably be ongoing for years to come. This is the tip of the iceberg, so don't expect anything final to happen anytime soon. It's one of those things where in 5-10 years there will probably be an awesome documentary on it.
Trump is clearly guilty, but assuming they were able to nail him on something, there is a lot of controversy surrounding indicting a sitting president, so one school of thought is that they would seal it and save that for when Trump is done his term.
We knew this was coming soon because Mueller's team began returning to their normal posts in the past weeks. Hopefully it is able to provide the clarity everyone is looking for one way or the other, and weed out a bunch of garbage on the way.
I think 2020 will be one of the most important and highly participated in elections in a very long time - lots of good Dem candidates announcing now too.
Last edited by Mitsu3000gt; 03-22-2019 at 04:24 PM.
I’ve never understood the “can’t indict a President”
He’s not above the law. He’s not the King.
If there's nothing serious in that report, I am going to laugh. I hope this hysteria was worth it.
I have a busted screen on my iPhone, and often end up with periods instead of spaces.
Punching mueller.report into my address bar took me here:
mueller.report
I’d be glad if there’s nothing in this report. An investigation into the President involving conspiracy with another nation to steal an election shouldn’t be a good thing.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There won’t be nothing, considering who’s already been indicted and sent to jail.
On nothing to do with collusion, or rigging an election. But keep trying lol.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Leak of the redacted version the public will see
Who knows. Hopefully we find out.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But here’s where we stand.
I’ll be curious to see what the Trump Tower meetings, Trump Jr, all that was about.2018 Russia Investigation Current Tally:
Guilty By Trial: - Paul Manafort (Trump’s Political Consultant) (8 Charges) (10 Charges Mistrial)
Guilty By Federal Judge: - Alex van der Zwann (Worked with Rick Gates and Paul Manafort) (1 Charge)
Plead Guilty: - Michael Flynn (National Security Advisor) (1 Charge) - Rick Gates (Trump’s Political Consultant) (2 Charges) - Michael Cohen (Trump’s Personal Attorney/RNC Deputy Finance Chair) (8 Charges) - George Papadopoulos (Member of the Foreign Policy Advisory Panel) (1 Charge) - Samuel Patten (Associate of Paul Manafort and Cambridge Analytica) (1 Charge)
Plead Guilty (Wanted To, But Denied Guilty Plea): - Paul Manafort (Tried getting guilty plea after his first trial (Found guilty on 8 charges while the 10 other charges are still ongoing). My opinion/guess is He was denied because Mueller’s team probably already knows what he was going to tell them
Recused: - Jeff Sessions (Attorney General)
Granted Immunity: - David Pecker (CEO of National Enquirer/Trump’s friend) (Pecker claims there is a safe of decades of damaging stories of Trump. Rachel Maddow touched on how the National Enquirer repeatedly put out anti Hillary cover stories. “Control the medium, control the message.”) - Allen Weisselberg (CFO of Trump Organization) - Andrew Miller (Roger Stone’s Aide)
Granted Immunity (Manafort Trial): - Donna Duggan (Moody Insurance Worldwide Employee) - Conor O'Brien (Former KWC employee) - Cindy Laporta (Paul Manafort’s Accountant) - James Brennan (Federal Savings Bank Mortgage Banker) - Dennis Raico (Federal Savings Bank Mortgage Banker)
Trump will be as implicated in this as Trudeau was in SNC.
I can eat more hot wings than you.
No its not. None of that has to do with Russian foreign interference. It has to do eith tax fraud, loan fraud, and election spending fraud.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Zero.evidence or indictments on russian collusion or interference, which the Muller case was for. And nothing to do with Trump on RUSSIAN interference or collusion.
Hahahahahahahaha, too rich. And now polls are pointing to Trump winning the next election if it were held today. Simply amazing.
No collusion: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47688187
So Putin got him elected, but Trump didn't know about it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Well, the official no collusion finding means I won a $100 bet.
What a bunch of whiny leftard democrat sore loser crybabies.
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Why would there be anything in the report? Trump is a crook and an orangutan, but this was 100% Hillary's doing.
They'll have to go elsewhere to get rid of him.
GT1R. 8.82@169
Mission
Popcorn indeed.
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
I can't give you anymore rep for thisThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Apparently you can have collusion without knowing you are colluding. Man, what a world we live in. I guess obstruction of justice (which wasn't the original claim made against Trump and crew) is the new goalpost. Likely to lose.
Trump 2020! Build that wall! Maybe we'll finally see a Clinton investigation and all of her illegal shenanigans will be exposed.
Watching CNN's heads exploding is beauty. But for how hard they pushed this Russian collusion story, even after being caught red handed admitting it was completely fabricated, really paints them into a corner if they ever investigate the actual Russian collusion. How does CNN spin that one if their own candidate Hillary every gets pinched for this?
I was sitting in a pub in London over Xmas and discussing this with a friend.
He was convinced Trump was going to be impeached or impeached in his term. I said he wont be, my friend could not understand why I thought that and I explained my reasoning. See Ive had this theory (and im getting kinda scared I might be right.)
They can't nail trump and won't. Its because if they do, then it creates the same kind of framework to investigate Hillary in the same manner. She is worse.
What makes it worse is that on CBC radio they had some guy who worked for the CIA (I could be wrong) giving a interview about some of this and how Trump was bad etc. Well now..this also makes the CIA look incompetent.