Yeah all the other provinces with PSTs have no deficits at all.
Yeah all the other provinces with PSTs have no deficits at all.
Things that looks odd to me and if someone can explain the logic:
- UCP write off the rail contract while keeping curtailment in place for another year. While Husky is cutting investment laying off people b/c of curtailment. Why not ride out the contract for more revenue? Even if it only break even, it would have spur some more investments.
- So if the tax bracket freeze in place forever or just this year's budget?
When pushed, Toews say the government has no interest pushing for PST..... with qualifier - this session of gov.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Overall, I'm disappointed at this budget in the sense that it doesn't feel much different than NDP's except everyone still pay more but with less people working. It's still a pray oil can be $100/barrel again budget.
Last edited by Xtrema; 10-25-2019 at 08:41 AM.
Let's just understand this - having a PST won't make a difference to either improvement of services or to lowering the deficit.
May be a fighting chance to put oil royalty back into Heritage fund instead of OPEX.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don't think the voters would stand for a PST, so I'm not saying it's a viable political option. However, putting variable revenue sources (like resource royalties) somewhere other than OPEX makes a HUGE amount of sense. I personally think heritage fund is the right place, but hey, I could be convinced of another location.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We will have deficits. That's not necessarily a bad thing as long as it's kept in check. Interest rates will never rise to high levels again unless as a result of very poor monetary policy by the BoC.Overall, I'm disappointed at this budget in the sense that it doesn't feel much different than NDP's except everyone still pay more but with less people working. It's still a pray oil can be $100/barrel again budget.
But $100 billion is very extreme considering Alberta's population. Ontario's basically at their debt ceiling. Any higher and their bonds will be junk.
- - - Updated - - -
Well then this budget makes sense. Slowly undo the damage the NDP wrought - borrowed funds were used for daily operating expenses - and go from there.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Actually, AISH doesn't even cover the cost of living these days. My Father In Law can't work due to mental illness and the family has to supplement his income so he can have any kind of decent life.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So yes, getting AISH benefits capped does suck.
I'm not on board with making fun of AISH recipients.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
AISH has never paid for the cost of living in any decade.
"Forever" in the sense that the de-indexing is being used as a way to project income tax revenue increases to 2023. But not in forever that it could be changed before then if they want toThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Are you saying that if the UCP brought in a PST, Albertans wouldn't vote them back in next election? I'm pretty sure they've got it in the bag for the 40 years or so.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think Kenney will be ejected immediately. Just like Stalemach was. Party will be around.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Yup. One or two budgets from now all they'd have to announce is that the NDP fucked the books so badly that they have no choice and they are implementing it. People would still vote for them in the end, hell it might even give them more support as it stokes the anti-ndp fireThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Or we could learn to live within our means with reasonable levels of public services.
Nah that would be silly.
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There's no way. This is Kenney's party. He bought it, and owns it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Still requires a referendum so no it won't ever go ahead in this province. Hack and Slash is the AB way.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don’t think raj was trying to poke fun at AISH recipients. More so people who are bad with money.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
My uncles has been in AISH since he was 18 and it’s a very small amount of money.
really? what's preventing a government from deciding a PST on their own without a referendum?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There's a law that says a referendum is required.
Gov't could rollback the law but that's generally considered unseemly.
http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Acts/A36.pdfThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
A referendum would be required. Would be a hard sell but if they push hard an agenda that a) its the NDPs fault (maybe throw in the liberal feds too for good measure) and b) the other option is higher income taxes it might be enough to sway the public to accept it.