Originally Posted by
sabad66
Not a finance guy so i don't have the history behind the site nor do i care about it. I only ever see it because i browse the_donald here and there (believe it or not - i do read stuff on there because I like to understand where the other is coming from on issues).
The claim that it's invalid is not because it is referenced by alt right people (although that will tell you which way it leans), i implied that because no human will put their real name behind the articles. At least mainstream news articles have real people's names behind them so it gives them and the editors motivation to be truthful. These sites with fake names, they can write whatever they want without any repercussions of being sued and that is a problem IMO.
The truth is always somewhere in the middle, but i am ALWAYS less inclined to believe a site with anonymous authors. If you don't then that's great, you do you.