Originally Posted by
syscal
There are hundreds of sworn affidavits, and I've listened to probably 20 testimonies in these hearings so far, where poll workers were not allowed to observe the counts.
Here's an example from AZ from multiple witnesses in multiple districts. Duplicate ballots are ones that were created to replace ballots that can't be scanned. They take the bad ballot, copy over the selections to a new one, and then scan it in the machine. This SHOULD be done under observation by both parties, but they would stack these in a bin and someone in a cubicle or other room would recreate those by hand and under no observation at all. When questioning why they can't observe, the supervisors simply didn't answer. So, no meaningful observation at all. That said, the estimated count is in the 1000's at each location this happened. For example, faxed in votes from the military.
Other examples were signature matching being accepted, where witnesses state in their sworn affidavits that the signatures being accepted were nothing even close and quite often the exact same over and over.
This is one of the arguments being made. Dominion really has nothing to do with it. How many votes to turn AZ? 10,457 difference, so 5229 votes...