2020 US Election mega thread

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The fact that you still believe that there's some mysterious voter fraud conspiracy happening and that evidence is magically going to appear after nearly a month of allegations with no proof is pretty embarrassing.

But hey I'm sure on their 30th time in court after losing the previous 29 times they'll do better.

I said *IF* it turns out they were wrong. I have my thoughts, but I'm not making any statements as fact at this point.

It's incredible how you're 100% correct, 100% of the time. I'm speculating here and you're replying with blanket statements. You are the most brainwashed person in this thread my friend.

[The_Rural_Juror]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You are the most brainwashed person in this thread my friend.

You have to admit that you read some batshit stuff, dude. This is coming from a guy who occasionally WSBs.
Maybe NPR once in a while?

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You have to admit that you read some batshit crazy stuff, dude. This is coming from a guy who occasionally WSBs.
Maybe NPR once in a while?

I do, but I'm not presenting any of it as fact since it's all hard to believe. What I DON'T do is get all my news from sources that support my opinion, and then spout if off here like it's 100% fact.

Here's an example.

I watched the entire hearing in front the, yes republican, PA Senate.

Trump's suit there, or at least parts I remember - with sworn affidavits and testimonies, with whistleblowers that will need to be subpoenaed if they get that far.
1) Unequal access to voting. Computerized voting confused the elderly and mistakes were not allowed to be corrected even if pointed out
2) Impossible jumps in vote counts, around 570k to Biden with 3200 to Trump. Key point, the machines are not physically capable of scanning that many during that time period. (for example, rated to scan 60 sheets per minute = not enough time to actually make the jump).
3) Poll watchers being barred from viewing or being in the area.
4) Important one: State Supreme Court legislating changes to election laws right before the election. Supreme Court doesn't get to make or change laws, they only interpret them.

That's from memory. Now, the statements I hear are "they are baseless and have no proof!!!!" because everyone is focusing on the conspiracy part. Take the four things above that don't mention wild Dominion hacking and things, are backed by loads of witnesses and sworn affidavits, and tell me the suit is baseless and they have no proof?

Is it all 100% true? No idea, but it needs to be investigated.

[pheoxs]

[Warning] Brainwashed posted apparently.

Oh look, Trump lost another appeal in PA.

A federal appeals court on Friday rejected an attempt by President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign to keep alive its effort to undo the result of Pennsylvania’s presidential election.

The blistering opinion from a panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, all three of whom were nominated by Republican presidents, said that the Trump campaign’s “claims have no merit.”

But the appeals court noted in its 21-page opinion that when standing before Brann in a courtroom, Giuliani said that the campaign “doesn’t plead fraud” in the case.

“Calling an election unfair does not make it so,” the 3rd Circuit’s opinion read. “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Brann, in his written decision, said that the campaign’s lawyers failed to present “compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption” in their unprecedented bid to invalidate millions of ballots.

Choose your source:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/27/trum...tion-case.html

https://www.thedailybeast.com/court-...thing-decision

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-p...ay-2020-11-27/

https://www.wsgw.com/trump-campaign-...-pennsylvania/

[Mitsu3000gt]

Brann's whole ruling is pretty savage, and he's a republican haha. I like reading them but some of them are pretty long.

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

[Warning] Brainwashed posted apparently.

I'll rephrase to "You are the most arrogant person in this thread my friend". Better?

As for your post, the next step is SCOTUS. Big deal, this was predicted and prepared for - no new revelations in that news.

[The_Rural_Juror]

Syscal needs to crack open a cold one and enjoy some dank memes.

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Syscal needs to crack open a cold one and enjoy some dank memes.

Sounds good to me

I'm watching everything in the US election out of pure curiosity. When I make an observation based on the shit I'm hearing/reading, it nothing more than that.

The left's reporting from the the past four years is just as riddled with conspiracies as the reporting from the right since the election. I don't buy the deep speculative conspiracy stuff, but there's a lot happening down there right now.

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You have to admit that you read some batshit stuff, dude.

I think it's also worth mentioning that I don't know if I am reading anything batshit, outside of a rabbit hole here and there.

I play YouTube in the background and I listen/watch things like the Senate hearings from Facebook/Twitter CEO's. I don't need to read the biased commentary from news sources afterward, because I watched the whole damn thing myself. Same with PA hearing. PA judges throwing out the case makes sense since they are pretty much investigating themselves. I don't believe there was expectation of anything otherwise but things have to go in order.

Something pops up in my "next" list on YouTube stating Dominion Voting Systems VP is gone and omfg, they've cleared out all their offices and linkedin profiles! Um...neat, except fact-check says they did so to protect themselves, which checks out with me since anyone involved in this thing are getting threats. From lawyers, to citizens on both sides of the story.

The reason I started watching full footage of these things is because I can't get the same amount of information from ANY other source, or without extreme bias.

Hunter Biden laptop? Interesting one that isn't coming up much. I found this site, which oddly enough I cannot find on Google but can on duckduckgo - https://gtv.org/ . Anyone that says Hunter wasn't doing SOME sideways shit has no leg to stand on if you search his name there (NSFW if you do). Does it mean the allegations against Joe Biden's involvement are true? Don't know, but Hunter sure has some demons. Is it a good source of reliable and unbiased news? Hell no, but does 100% provide proof that Hunter is....troubled.

Canadian politics - "opposition questions?", "liberals speech for Canadians, always speeched for Canadians, and we'll continue to speech for Canadians" *clap clap clap*. Yes, I watch loads of House of Commons question periods, because apparently I'm a sucker for punishment.

Anyway, that's where I'm at. I'm not a tinfoil guy, but I'm not big on having my information spoonfed to me without questioning it either. In the end I find there's a lot of talk, rarely actual action taken, and the world continues to spin. But, it's better than sitting through another season of <insert generic show here>.

[The_Rural_Juror]

I am not clicking that link unless there is free porn. No siree

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I am not clicking that link unless there is free porn. No siree

Hunter Biden porn...does that count?

[The_Rural_Juror]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Hunter Biden porn...does that count?

Proof that you are batshit crazy.

[syscal]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Proof that you are batshit crazy.

point taken

[pheoxs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Proof that you are batshit crazy.

Hey it's perfectly normal that he replied to your comment then a few hours later replied to the same comment again both with full page replies.

You know the rule. Never call crazy people crazy.

[The_Rural_Juror]

Have a meme everyone.

[BigDL]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Have a meme everyone.

I do not miss those days at all.

[syscal]

Got a kick out of this one this week.

[dirtsniffer]

Biden broke his foot playing with his dog

[vengie]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Biden broke his foot playing with his dog

At his advanced age is this recoverable? Do they need to amputate ?

[dirtsniffer]

Just a walking boot for several weeks