It is or at least was a significant source of revenue for the USA. I mean sure, you have to burn more fuel to use it - but isn't that the point? You can't get to mars without burning a lot of fuel.
Registered User
Should the USA re-introduce Incandescent light bulbs?
It is or at least was a significant source of revenue for the USA. I mean sure, you have to burn more fuel to use it - but isn't that the point? You can't get to mars without burning a lot of fuel.
Cocoa $11,000 per tonne.
AMG Killer
Vote to delete pointless thread?
Machining, Fabricating, Welding etc.
Registered User
That would be all his threads.Originally Posted by legendboy
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by SJW
Once again another useless post by JRSCOOLDUDE.
Originally posted by snowcat
Don't let the e-thugs and faggots get to you when they quote your posts and write stupid shit.^^ Fact CheckedOriginally posted by JRSC00LUDE
I say stupid shit all the time.
Registered User
Time for a Zenops containment thread where he can post away all this facinating topics.
Beyond Bully
Leo is a Legend. Nothing will take that away but it's time for Ask ZenOps section lolThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I am user #49Originally posted by rage2
Shit, there's only 49 users here, I doubt we'll even break 100
Guest
They never got rid of them in the first place in the US?
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
Registered User
They did it on a state by state. I'm pretty sure California was the first, long before Canada went efficient. I'd guess its somewhere around half by now, so they can completely turn it back around if they really wanted to.
Incandescents are fine in cold climate northern states, where excess heat is not complete evil.
Cocoa $11,000 per tonne.
Posting Permissions
Quote
