Originally Posted by
you&me
Isn't any builder only as good as their client / budget? (well, not any, but you know what I mean) Specs can only be ratcheted up so high and as long as those build specs are executed correctly (mostly by subs anyways, right?), there isn't a lot of room for variance between high end builders? For instance, is it wrong to assume Trickle Creek would build you a pretty baller house if they were given the right specs and budget?
I have friends that have custom built with Rockwood and the homes seem pretty baller... Same with Veranda, Maillot, etc...
IIRC, you've mentioned your family's in the custom home biz and (again IIRC) and you've mentioned build costs of >1200/sf to be "truly baller"... I mean, that puts a modestly sized, 5k sf "baller house" at $6mm, without the dirt. What are you getting for that extra 800 bucks a foot (or so) above and beyond the typical spec-built Rockwood / Veranda / Maillot, etc? Or does is simply come down to finishes? Honed mammoth tusk mantles and virgin worm foreskin wallpaper?