Well, as long as you all are the ones paying for it - go right ahead.
Even at 1,000x less cost than Apollo - its still on the expensive side. If you ask me. Elon seems to be targeting 1000x less expensive. So instead of 100 Billion per trip, say only 100 million per trip to pay a round of golf on the moon.
The switchover to electric vehicles on earth will have to be accelerated, because there is not enough chemical propellant to do both if even a few thousand people want the space trip (to 250 miles above earth). Try to do both, and a farmer may not be able to afford fuel to take in a harvest.
https://www.marketplace.org/2016/05/...onomic-policy/
BTW: When Elon says it is 1,000x less expensive - that is insanely important. If you can only afford to send one tin of beans along with a Mars astronaut and have him barely survive - Then sending 1,000 tins of beans is that much better. Same with fuel, just incase anything goes wrong.
Cost reduction gives redundancy. Redundancy often means the difference between success and failure, in fact - in almost all exploration cases it means success.