you have it right here.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteMy comment was only meant to be a general shitpost at 89c's expense for my own amusement - that's about all I'm good for here.
Edit: but i'll bite.
Yeah...on one hand there are people who take on more debt than then can service and it bites them. On the other hand are people who can sustainably manage the debt they take. Taking a finance loan on my car instead of paying for it in cash frees up cashflow for me to invest and earn a greater return than the cost of the financing; I come out ahead, versus saving and dumping that cash into car as a lumpsum.
The counterpoint to that view is I could have not taken the car loan at all and instead invested everything and come out even more ahead over the same period of time. Very true, and that lifestyle could work for some people - but what's the impact to me of living like that? I didn't want to ride the bus, so I made the discretionary decision to take some debt which I assessed as being within my means to service, to get what I wanted. I don't mean to assert that this debt brings a greater degree of financial stability to my life, but it fit the value equation of my life and brings positive impacts to other areas of my life vs. hoarding all my shekels until I could buy the car as a lump sum. These are the decisions we make as consumers.
I interned for a medical startup which avoided debt like the plague and grew only when they could internally sustain it. It was a very safe, stable way to grow the business and avoids the risk of growing unsustainably, or too quickly. They ended up getting bought out and the owners made a pile of money. One could argue they could have grown faster, or achieved a higher valuation, had they taken on some debt to fund growth. Could be true, could not be - but ultimately the proposition of debt didn't fit their value equation. These were the decisions they made as operators.
For one to say that 'all debt (aside from a mortgage) is the devil' and you just need to 'work really hard and grind for what you want' and 'if you have to take debt, you're entitled and just not working hard enough' and then flex superiority for living that way is a naïve simplification, and in my opinion not a very well-reasoned outlook - so i'll bust some balls over it for my own amusement.
A cash purchase or taking on debt amount to the same thing.