Originally Posted by
you&me
Be erect no more, my mighty friend, as my opinion of the Audi-ness of Lamborghinis (Gallardo specifically) is based on previous ownership.
The engine, transmission, awd system, gauges, hvac, infotainment, even the keys - all Audi and they barely try and hide it. And I'm not even saying this is a bad thing, but it does mean the cars are relatively inexpensive to service and it has nothing to do with Weissach being charitable with their rates (but like I said, FoA being so greasy also makes them look better by comparison). In fact, I'd say the Audighinis - along with the last-gen Ford GTs - are the bargain supercars when it comes to service cost relative to values.
Back on topic - The Lussos depreciate horribly, but the incremental depreciation of a driven car vs. a garage queen is the only way to make any sense of owning one. We should also not ignore the strangeness that is the Ferrari market... Cars that are often unloved in period often find a following as they age. 612s were deader-than-dead for a period, but interest had piqued as the design has aged well and is becoming more appreciated for its elegance. I don't think anyone will make that same argument for the FF & Lusso, but we can't discount the notion that this is very likely the last NA V12 2+2 Ferrari ever and that will definitely mean something in the years to come.
OP - go see Kulu, have him find you the best example he can, service the car at Riegel and drive the wheels off!