Alec Baldwin the murderer.

[killramos]

Plus presumably “ ALEC BALDWIN ” is actually some “BaldwinCo” that insulates him personally from liability.

[Swank]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Baldwin walks and makes a Netflix special.

Then in the special they recreate the scene and make the same mistake again IRL.

[suntan]

But then they can make a special about that mistake.

[Tik-Tok]

I'm not sure Baldwin can get anymore special.

[ExtraSlow]

You are thinking of his brother Stephen

[Xtrema]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You are thinking of his brother Stephen

[gwill]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I don't know much about the movie business, but IF there is liability / culpability for a producer, I'm not sure how you'd pin that on Alec Baldwin, when this movie has 12 producers. In my limited understanding, the "Line Producer" is the one actually mkind day-to-day decisions on the set.
Attachment 111052

I'm also not a lawyer, but I don't think you can take a basket of "probably" items to make a verdict. you need one "for sure", don't you?

the new York times article quoted the prosecutor saying the producer has a duty to ensure safety on the set. Of which this was apparently a total disaster on this one.

So his added responsibility combined with shooting the gun was their decision to lay charges.

[killramos]

While I’m generally supportive of throwing way more people in jail. This seems like a questionable place to start throwing resources at.

[ExtraSlow]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

the new York times article quoted the prosecutor saying the producer has a duty to ensure safety on the set.

So, do you charge all 12 producers, or how does that work?

[Tik-Tok]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So, do you charge all 12 producers, or how does that work?

Just the most famous one who shoots his mouth off about gun control.

[Xtrema]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

While I’m generally supportive of throwing way more people in jail. This seems like a questionable place to start throwing resources at.

Unless DA/Sheriff want to make a career out of taking down Baldwin.

[killramos]

You make it sound like the guy is el chapo or something

[gwill]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So, do you charge all 12 producers, or how does that work?

you charge the person who claims he never pulled the trigger but happened to be pointing the gun at someone while it went off... that happens to be Baldwin.

Producer or no producer give him his day in court and let them fight it out.

[Xtrema]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

You make it sound like the guy is el chapo or something

Didn't that chick defending Johnny Depp got partner out of that gig?

Since DA/Sheriff are elected positions in some states, who doesn't want from free press to get you name out there for recognition.

And hanging Baldwin out to dry is almost totally risk free. If it's El Chapo, your family may burn to a crisp before the week is out.

[ExtraSlow]

Well this thread, seems to think that you can charge Baldwin "because he's a producer" but at the same time, he's the only producer who you'd charge "because he was holding the gun".
I think the DA or Sherrifffff or whoever would need to pick one of those reasons, not try to pile them together.

[Xtrema]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Well this thread, seems to think that you can charge Baldwin "because he's a producer" but at the same time, he's the only producer who you'd charge "because he was holding the gun".
I think the DA or Sherrifffff or whoever would need to pick one of those reasons, not try to pile them together.

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I wouldn't be surprised Santa Fe, New Mexico's DA is up for re-election and this how she gets her 2 minutes of fame.

"On my watch, no one is above the law and everyone deserve's justice". And if you're charging for the death, then why not charge on behalf of the director who was also injured? If you can't prove attempted, how about aggravated assault or some shit? Sounds like a case where clearly they are being guided due to the harm the act caused and not the gravity of the act itself. And how the fuck is it 'Justice' to charge someone who already has the guilt of living with something like this (and likely paid a shit tons of money to the family already) and who clearly wouldn't have known that a real bullet was going to be put into a prop gun. That being said, this goes to show how important it is to follow the Canadian firearm handling rules, including NEVER to point a firearm at someone no matter what.

I'm siding with Shak that DA is going for her own gain and this case is otherwise pointless.

[killramos]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Well this thread, seems to think that you can charge Baldwin "because he's a producer" but at the same time, he's the only producer who you'd charge "because he was holding the gun".
I think the DA or Sherrifffff or whoever would need to pick one of those reasons, not try to pile them together.

Cognitive dissonance is fascinating

[suntan]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Well this thread, seems to think that you can charge Baldwin "because he's a producer" but at the same time, he's the only producer who you'd charge "because he was holding the gun".
I think the DA or Sherrifffff or whoever would need to pick one of those reasons, not try to pile them together.

Having dealt with too many lawyery issues the past while, they do stuff like this and see what sticks.

[gwill]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Well this thread, seems to think that you can charge Baldwin "because he's a producer" but at the same time, he's the only producer who you'd charge "because he was holding the gun".
I think the DA or Sherrifffff or whoever would need to pick one of those reasons, not try to pile them together.

i just shared what I read as someone earlier in the thread wondered if he was being charged as a shooter or in another capacity due to his role with the filming.

Here's the article


https://www.nytimes.com/article/alec...stigation.html

[max_boost]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm siding with Shak that DA is going for her own gain and this case is otherwise pointless.

Yup reasonable doubt - mark gerragos was saying just that