This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He also has better legal access to better guns now that he’s 18 right?
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He also has better legal access to better guns now that he’s 18 right?
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
Insurance covers it rightThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I am user #49Originally posted by rage2
Shit, there's only 49 users here, I doubt we'll even break 100
Kids gotta know that you want to survive with fist battle scars to get the attention - Guns are pretty much flip a coin as to whether the other guy happens you notice you first or you happen to notice him first. And at 17 missing the first shot is also a real thing which again is a coin toss if the other guy doesn't miss after hearing your shot.
Coin flip is literally the stupidest game to play. Both of them probably have suicide complexes, which is never good for any innocent bystanders.
Last edited by ZenOps; 11-17-2021 at 11:37 AM.
Cocoa $10,000 per ton.
Apparently there is a shitshow with the drone footage now. They gave different versions of it to the defendant and the jurors.
Im sorry. One more
OMG, it's getting interesting regarding the drone footage. Either they had no idea how to handle digital evidence or it was done on purpose.
Either way, the burden is on the prosecutors. They're fucked.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
coles notes or link?
With todays digital manipulation ability, no footage can technically be considered raw and unadulterated by the AI in some way.
Digital stabilization, compression techniques. None of it is technically admissable as infallable. Even the most expensive movie reel film is not infallable, especially the old stuff because it only captured (sometimes black and white) but less than 85% of the visible colour spectrum.
Example: Audrey Hepburn was obviously one of the most beautiful women ever to exist, but I do wonder what her skin tone was in her modelling years.
It doesn't need to be infallable to be admissable, just not manipulated knowingly or maliciously.
If it was resized though, thats a problem. But then again, its highly dependant on viewing device as well. If you look at a video on Youtube in a window - it will automatically lower the resolution as opposed to a maximized 4K screen. If you look at a video on a tablet without Widevine, it will not display 1080. Maybe this was intentional on the defense part as well. Personally I think the defense is panicking a bit, if innocent on all counts, they might already have been done by now.
Does dressgate matter when looking on an Ipad during the day and a Samsung at night? It kind of does, even though its the exact same digital image. Its only prudent for the jury to ask for a second look. Black and Blue Rittenhouse is true, White and Gold put him in the hold.
Matrix is real.
Last edited by ZenOps; 11-17-2021 at 02:03 PM.
Cocoa $10,000 per ton.
The gov't used a video as their key piece of evidence. (They wanted to show that Kyle provoked the attacks on him.)This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The video they gave to the defence was a cropped and compressed version of that video that showed fuck all.
it's all about the drone footage that's supposed to show Kyle pointing his at Rosenbaum first instigating the entire thing. I can't see shit from the video to be honest, both Kyle and Rosenbaum were probably a few pixels big. They argued about it during examination about the authenticity and quality. The defense now found out that the copy they received is indeed a lessor quality version. Prosecution is using all kinds of excuse on airdrop and google box that the downgrading happened somewhere in between without their knowledge.
The video file that the prosecution used was saved at X time.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The video file that the defense was given was sent to them cropped, compressed significantly, and created at X+ 21 minutes.
Sounds like they sent the video over green bubbles.
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
yeah that too. It's going to be a side battle between fat guy and the lady assistant. Refill here please!
Do they really handle digital evidence via airdrop and dropbox? is it because of Covid?
And the prosecution blamed Android phones for their problems
I can eat more hot wings than you.
Jokes aside, Airdrop (with some exceptions such as new cinematic videos), Dropbox, Google Drive doesn't recompress. It's the original file 1:1. The prosecution says they emailed it from an Apple phone. Videos gets compressed over email with the iOS mail app. On wifi/5G it compresses it less than over LTE or lower. Without wifi/5G, it's potato quality, but not as bad as MMS green bubbles.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That's the technical explanation. Blame Apple not android (assuming Android sends video files unmolested over email).
Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name
That was all nonsense anyway. They emailed the file to the defense.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There is an old saying: You only shout shenanigans when you think you are about to lose.
BTW: Can't the defense simply ask for states evidence?
Cocoa $10,000 per ton.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You shout shenanigans everyday, you must be losing your mind
edit: My first negative rep
Last edited by eglove; 11-17-2021 at 02:39 PM.
I'm waiting for the prosecution to use the chewbacca defense for their incompetence