Roe vs. Wade. The US officials back to stone ages

[Buster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Either more Americans are pro-life than noted by the louder voices on Twitter OR more likely Americans want safe/legal/rare but have higher priorities than abortion in their vote decision process.

I don’t see this decision changing the 2022 mid terms nor the 2024 election, unless republicans go for a federal ban. On that note, I expect republicans will move for a national ban in an attempt to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Is someone who wants to restrict abortions at 30 weeks pro life or pro choice?

[duaner]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Christian zealots are the worst people.

What does this have to do with anything?

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Duaner and his alt killramos.

Ah, but that isn't true. I've never kept it a secret.

- - - Updated - - -

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Is someone who wants to restrict abortions at 30 weeks pro life or pro choice?

Pro-abortion.

[duaner]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Stop nominating anti-choice people to be conservative MP candidates and this problem will go away.

No one is anti-choice; that is an implicit straw man.

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Rights are inalienable.

Pre-viability abortion should be a right, ergo it should not require legislation to enumerate it.

On what grounds are rights inalienable and on what grounds should abortion be a right?

[Buster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

On what grounds are rights inalienable and on what grounds should abortion be a right?

Because I said so.

[finboy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Is someone who wants to restrict abortions at 30 weeks pro life or pro choice?

I mean, I’m on board with tax incentives to anyone who has an abortion so I’m probably the wrong guy to ask

[duaner]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Because I said so.

Besides that. What legitimate grounds can you base those two assertions on?

[Buster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Besides that. What legitimate grounds can you base those two assertions on?

It's First Principles - a priori.

[jutes]

Humans are the greatest contributors to this climate emergency. We should be actively trying to reduce everyone’s individual footprint. What better way to reduce the population than to reduce births. Taxing unwanted births is also an option.

[finboy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Humans are the greatest contributors to this climate emergency. We should be actively trying to reduce everyone’s individual footprint. What better way to reduce the population than to reduce births. Taxing unwanted births is also an option.

Extra tfsa room for every year you don’t have a kid, paid for by eliminating the family tax credit

[killramos]

I’ve taken a very cynical view of all these companies announcing they will pay women to travel to get abortions in a different state.

Makes a lot of sense, an employee actually having and caring for a kid must have much more than a $4,000 impact to a companies bottom line.

$4k check to abort the kid is much cheaper to a company.

[finboy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I’ve taken a very cynical view of all these companies announcing they will pay women to travel to get abortions in a different state.

Makes a lot of sense, an employee actually having and caring for a kid must have much more than a $4,000 impact to a companies bottom line.

$4k check to abort the kid is much cheaper to a company.

And likely get bonus ESG points

[Yolobimmer]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's First Principles - a priori.

You have no idea what first principles are.

What a shock.

- - - Updated - - -

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

What does this have to do with anything?




Ah, but that isn't true. I've never kept it a secret.

- - - Updated - - -



Pro-abortion.

Absolutely EVERYTHING.

[ZenOps]

Its pretty obvious that the US social credit system (the FICO score) rewards those who adhere to the policies at any given time.

Chinas social credit system pales in comparison to the tracking that the US does on every medical procedure.

[Buster]

figures a yolotard thread would turn into a train wreck...haha. I tried, anyway!

[Yolobimmer]

So how about that big huge no privacy government with this abortion of a decision? No comments on government overeach, privacy concerns, authoritarianism?

Weird.

Very weird.

[zechs]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

It's First Principles - a priori.

No, its how you interpret them. And you are wrong in this case.

Somebody drank the kool aid a bit too hard in his philosophy courses. Explain specifically how you know a "clump of cells" becomes a human. Viability is arbitrary, viability continually lowers in time, and viability has nothing to do with consciousness.

To be so callous with life that is innocent is ridiculous if you actually believe in rights.

This picture sums it up

[Buster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

No, its how you interpret them. And you are wrong in this case.

Somebody drank the kool aid a bit too hard in his philosophy courses. Explain specifically how you know a "clump of cells" becomes a human. Viability is arbitrary, viability continually lowers in time, and viability has nothing to do with consciousness.

To be so callous with life that is innocent is ridiculous if you actually believe in rights.

This picture sums it up

Of course it is arbitrary. That's the conundrum.

[Yolobimmer]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

No, its how you interpret them. And you are wrong in this case.

Somebody drank the kool aid a bit too hard in his philosophy courses. Explain specifically how you know a "clump of cells" becomes a human. Viability is arbitrary, viability continually lowers in time, and viability has nothing to do with consciousness.

To be so callous with life that is innocent is ridiculous if you actually believe in rights.

This picture sums it up

Lol!!! He didn't take philosophy. Highly doubtful he made it past social 33.

[DonJuan]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Let the adults talk.

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Because I said so.

Excellent contributions.

Let the adults have an adult conversation.

[Buster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Excellent contributions.

Let the adults have an adult conversation.

I just think it's funny that people were expecting a tomatard thread to go anything but sideways.