Quantcast
what's the section of the criminal code that covers "participation in a cover up" - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: what's the section of the criminal code that covers "participation in a cover up"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    0

    Default what's the section of the criminal code that covers "participation in a cover up"

    Say a bunch of people (employee) participate in a cover up to the truth of a car accident, protecting someone, what section of the criminal code would this fall under?

    I have use the search engine, but it goes nowhere. Can anyone help?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Turbo stuff
    Posts
    3,270
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Conspiracy, fraud if money/insurance is involved.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    ES Art Room
    My Ride
    #SadLife
    Posts
    3,109
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    182-b

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Turbo stuff
    Posts
    3,270
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThePenIsMightier View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    182-b
    Hot

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Conspiracy, fraud if money/insurance is involved.
    thanks. very useful. It's 465 (1) (b)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nothingburger Hill
    My Ride
    Garbanzo Bean
    Posts
    11,508
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    There are also non-criminal ramifications for insurance fraud in terms of getting future insurance, or holding certain professional jobs, being a corporate officer etc.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 1987
    Location
    SK
    My Ride
    Fit Dugan Signature (2016)
    Posts
    3,280
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    It was on this day that OP found out he's fucked.
    Originally posted by SJW
    Once again another useless post by JRSCOOLDUDE.
    Originally posted by snowcat
    Don't let the e-thugs and faggots get to you when they quote your posts and write stupid shit.
    Originally posted by JRSC00LUDE
    I say stupid shit all the time.
    ^^ Fact Checked

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nothingburger Hill
    My Ride
    Garbanzo Bean
    Posts
    11,508
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    HH has a more interesting life than I do. #jelly.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-...olas-tse-faced

    my case is 99% similar to this case

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nothingburger Hill
    My Ride
    Garbanzo Bean
    Posts
    11,508
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Did it happen in China? Because that's going to change my advice.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    Turbo stuff
    Posts
    3,270
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happy hopping View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    thanks. very useful. It's 465 (1) (b)
    That'll be $299.95

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Victoria Park
    My Ride
    '16 FoRS, '09 UZN215, '90 Z32, '15 Grom
    Posts
    4,044
    Rep Power
    55

    Default

    HH was the hopper. He switched seats with the driver for the cover up.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    55
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExtraSlow View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Did it happen in China? Because that's going to change my advice.
    no, here in Calgary.

    I have 1 more question:

    the person who was in the passenger side, got out, and hand me her driver licence + insurance, let's called her Jane Doe, as the person in the DRIVER side has no insurance. Now, we already establish that is illegal.

    So does that mean Jane Doe's insurance co. has to protect her from legal trouble? And pay a lawyer to defend her, because right now it's just a civil case of car damage. If the case goes to trial, the judge is going to find out she broke section 465 (1) (b) . That would become a criminal case. Is the insurance co. (Wanansea) obligate to protect Jane Doe because she's a client listed in the car policy?

    or does insurance co. only protects 3rd party law suit + car damage? and if that insurance co. does not protect her or get her a lawyer, and she ends up doing 2 month, would that give ground for her to sue her own insurance co.?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    ES Art Room
    My Ride
    #SadLife
    Posts
    3,109
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Name:  yes-question.gif
Views: 174
Size:  586.5 KB

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nothingburger Hill
    My Ride
    Garbanzo Bean
    Posts
    11,508
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Name:  giphy (6).gif
Views: 177
Size:  759.7 KB

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pallet Town
    Posts
    736
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    So what costume shop are you going to be using to dress up as Charles III?
    Defund NASA.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    C-Spot
    My Ride
    11sec S14, Lux Family Bus, VQ35HR
    Posts
    2,524
    Rep Power
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happy hopping View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    no, here in Calgary.

    I have 1 more question:

    the person who was in the passenger side, got out, and hand me her driver licence + insurance, let's called her Jane Doe, as the person in the DRIVER side has no insurance. Now, we already establish that is illegal.

    So does that mean Jane Doe's insurance co. has to protect her from legal trouble? And pay a lawyer to defend her, because right now it's just a civil case of car damage. If the case goes to trial, the judge is going to find out she broke section 465 (1) (b) . That would become a criminal case. Is the insurance co. (Wanansea) obligate to protect Jane Doe because she's a client listed in the car policy?

    or does insurance co. only protects 3rd party law suit + car damage? and if that insurance co. does not protect her or get her a lawyer, and she ends up doing 2 month, would that give ground for her to sue her own insurance co.?
    Is the person in the drivers seat a learner? Then yes the person in the passenger seat is instructing and has implied control of the vehicle. If not then you should be going after the at fault driver/owner of the car's insurance. At fault owner of the if they allowed the un-insured driver to drive the car. I believe.

    I believe in this case Wawanesa would only cover Jane Doe if she is the owner of the vehicle and/or is the instructor for a learning driver (this may be a fight for Jane Doe).

    How about saying what ACTUALLY happened? And not hypotheticals. There's prob a wealth of experience on here willing to help if its a real situation. Legal standards for hypotheticals is what judges are for.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Homeless
    My Ride
    Blue Dabadee
    Posts
    8,403
    Rep Power
    89

    Default

    TBH go after the person who is most likely to pay out.

    You think you have a better chance of getting money out of

    Chick with insurance

    Broke retard with no insurance

    Let her insurance company sort out if they were defrauded later.
    Originally posted by Thales of Miletus

    If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
    Originally posted by Toma
    fact.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yolobimmer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    guessing who I might be, psychologizing me with your non existent degree.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nothingburger Hill
    My Ride
    Garbanzo Bean
    Posts
    11,508
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Wait, whos' teh scammer, HH or the other party? I am so confused.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    Ford F150
    Posts
    439
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    HH was the driver without insurance I think. They swapped places with their passenger after an accident. Except the vehicle itself would need insurance, so I assume the driver wasn't the RO of the vehicle? Why do people make hypotheticals more confusing than the truth?
    I can eat more hot wings than you.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Canada Criminal Code Virus

    By Darkane in forum Computers, Consoles, and other Electronics
    Replies: 4
    Latest Threads: 11-02-2012, 12:46 PM
  2. Criminal code section 353 / automobile master key

    By Crystalrw in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 10
    Latest Threads: 08-10-2012, 08:31 PM
  3. WTB: Z600 data cable and covers, V400 data cable and covers

    By GucciBoy in forum Cellular Products
    Replies: 0
    Latest Threads: 11-24-2004, 10:55 PM
  4. Mitsu voiding warrantys for participation in motorsports

    By 4wheeldrift in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 26
    Latest Threads: 06-18-2004, 05:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •