LOL Sovereignty Act

[ExtraSlow]

They may still get thier chance!

[Thaco]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

NDP sad. Imagine the good they could have done.

ndp loves this shit, guaranteed win

[davidI]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

ndp loves this shit, guaranteed win

Who wants to take the over-under on a $100 billion debt in Alberta by 2027 when the NDP are done further wrecking shit?

Maybe $150 billion is a more appropriate wager amount but with a commodity bull market they'll have to successfully try to run deficits (I have faith in them succeeding).

[Thaco]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Who wants to take the over-under on a $100 billion debt in Alberta by 2027 when the NDP are done further wrecking shit?

Maybe $150 billion is a more appropriate wager amount but with a commodity bull market they'll have to successfully try to run deficits (I have faith in them succeeding).

if the cons wouldn't be so stupid a put someone who is not a complete whackjob in charge, they'd do just fine, it's their own fault. (same goes Federally with PP)

[mr2mike]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Who wants to take the over-under on a $100 billion debt in Alberta by 2027 when the NDP are done further wrecking shit?

Maybe $150 billion is a more appropriate wager amount but with a commodity bull market they'll have to successfully try to run deficits (I have faith in them succeeding).

Over.
But that Flames rink will get built on mostly tax payers backs and stuff us with the overspending and how it's the cost to do business.

[Buster]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

if the cons wouldn't be so stupid a put someone who is not a complete whackjob in charge, they'd do just fine, it's their own fault. (same goes Federally with PP)

Wackjob.is best job

[davidI]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

if the cons wouldn't be so stupid a put someone who is not a complete whackjob in charge, they'd do just fine, it's their own fault. (same goes Federally with PP)

Alberta's history of Premiers has been bloody awful. What reasonable candidates are even out there these days?

Federally, who would you have put forward instead of PP? I'm not sure I trust him but at least he focuses on the real issues facing Canadians - he'd still be my choice out of the available candidates.

[vengie]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

if the cons wouldn't be so stupid a put someone who is not a complete whackjob in charge, they'd do just fine, it's their own fault. (same goes Federally with PP)

See this is why no one takes you seriously.
Pierre Polievere a whack job? Lol.

Meanwhile we have old JT, Freeland and Jagmeet running the show.
I'll never understand a socialists double standard and how they justify it to themselves.

[sabad66]

PP is the right guy to beat Trudeau no doubt about it. But I think Smith really was the best the NDP could hope for. Still not entirely convinced they will beat the UCP but it’s going to be very close where in a province like AB it really shouldn’t be.

[jutes]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

See this is why no one takes you seriously.
Pierre Polievere a whack job? Lol.

Meanwhile we have old JT, Freeland and Jagmeet running the show.
I'll never understand a socialists double standard and how they justify it to themselves.

Because they are already elected so everything they do is justified. Only unelected officials can be criticized.

[Yolobimmer]

Yes. PP is a whack job.

He's stupid as fuck. Knows nothing about economics or financial instruments.

He's willing to lie and pull shit out of his assholento do one of his grandstand speeches.

He is continually outraged (fake) but has never once proposed a solution.

Only morons take him seriously, and he will hand Trudeau another win.

[davidI]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Because they are already elected so everything they do is justified. Only unelected officials can be criticized.

Don't you ever find it odd how the Liberals and NDP target voters / future voters without fully developed brains?

[ThePenIsMightier]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Don't you ever find it odd how the Liberals and NDP target voters / future voters without fully developed brains?

The school system is their starting point. Then they pay CBC to be the same level of far Left as Rebel Media is far Right.

[Darkane]

The voters who lean left, what are your thoughts on JT saying there’s no business case in LNG for Canada and Germany?

But he tried to sell hydrogen? I have something pretty specific to say depending on the responses.

[JRSC00LUDE]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Alberta's history of Premiers has been bloody awful. What reasonable candidates are even out there these days?

I'd argue SK is worse except for potentially 1st and 2nd term of Wall.

[max_boost]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

See this is why no one takes you seriously.
Pierre Polievere a whack job? Lol.

Meanwhile we have old JT, Freeland and Jagmeet running the show.
I'll never understand a socialists double standard and how they justify it to themselves.

[suntan]

Thaco is crazy in the same way JT is.

[kertejud2]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The voters who lean left, what are your thoughts on JT saying there’s no business case in LNG for Canada and Germany?

Not that long ago the big ask was to get a natural gas pipeline to the east converted to bitumen because that’s how uneconomical natural gas to European markets was.

Say JT does what you want and said ‘we’ll ensure the thing can get built, move heaven and Earth and whatever needs to be done to allow it to be built, you just need to find the capital’, it would still be an extremely risky business case. Who would be jumping to put up the money? You’re still talking about a $10B+ project that would take years to start exporting even on this hypothetical expedited regulatory fast track. That is one very risky bet that European demand would stay the same, and the price of natural gas to stay the same. At some point cheaper Russian gas will come back into the market and Europe’s new endgame will be to keep driving down reliance on gas more than ever to avoid this pressure going forward. Even if you duplicated regulatory streamlining, the bulk of US infrastructure just needs to be reversed to get import terminals changed to export ones, so they’ll be competing earlier which puts the risk even higher for a capital heavy LNG project to the East coast. Even if the regulatory conditions were relaxed and expedited, who is this a business case for?

Is Germany/the EU willing to pay for this project and put the money behind it if they’re so confident there’s a business case for it? Similar to Korea and Malaysia and China with Coastal Gas Link? For a project like that I think it would need to be a requirement to ensure they had skin in the game so that when the siren’s call of cheap Russian gas started up again they’d be the bag holders if they cut bait and ran.

[BerserkerCatSplat]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not that long ago the big ask was to get a natural gas pipeline to the east converted to bitumen because that’s how uneconomical natural gas to European markets was.

Say JT does what you want and said ‘we’ll ensure the thing can get built, move heaven and Earth and whatever needs to be done to allow it to be built, you just need to find the capital’, it would still be an extremely risky business case. Who would be jumping to put up the money?

There was a fully funded east coast LNG export line and terminal project ready to go two years ago and the Feds killed it. This was in the works for 4-5 years before the Euro energy crisis. By what means are you assessing this supposed high risk that brings you to a different conclusion than Gazoduc?

[ExtraSlow]

Financing is easy, you get long term supply deals. Like Qatar did.