I wouldn't be so sure. They can't even get approval in the USA to turn on a Tesla self driving system. Elons satellites do not have enough electrical power to stay in their respective orbits without ground station calculations. They can make minor corrections if told to do so, but if something hits like atmospheric drag or a solar flare, they must be controlled from the ground to compensate, or they fail very quickly.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
7.70 kilometers per second means that a gram of thrust in the wrong direction at the wrong time is a very bad thing. Likewise, if you have to burn 20 grams of fuel per day as thrust, that satellite will have a rough time lasting more than five years, which means you want to always have the supercomputer adjusting the movements to save on fuel.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/barryco...h=eb2f88a95fd7
What it comes down to is electrical power. You cannot have a self steering AI without using maybe 1KW of power, something that is lacking on anything in the air. Its infinitely better to have a 100KW megabrain on the earth with multiple calculation redundancies pumping a 100 watt signal as guidance.
All that being said: A communication balloon, if it can be steered and survive a couple years in the radiation and wind hell that is up there - would be a superior solution to Elons satellite fleet. Not only is it closer to earth for faster speed on shorter distances, it can carry much larger solar panels for more bandwidth, and its less expensive.
If you praise Elon for Starlink, one should be praising China for weather balloon tech.