Originally Posted by
LilDrunkenSmurf
This. Capitalism breeds competition, which is great. When you have no longer have competition, because the big incumbents buy them out/force them out/lobby them out, then you have... well, what we have today. Look at Telus/Rogers/Bell as an example. Or take a look at our "deregulated" energy grid that has us paying insanely high power costs compared to the rest of the country, while the gas that runs the power plants is insanely cheap.
Insurance, IMO, should be not-for-profit, and something like universal healthcare, or at least a govt provided minimum health care would stop people from just _dying_ because shareholder value.
There's nothing wrong with profit, everyone deserves their bag, but if you're making 22 _billion_ in profit, and you specialize in helping people live? Maybe don't try to limit the length of time anesthesia can be used in a surgery, setup a fake AI that automatically denies 90% of claims, and also bring the industry average on denials up by biggest the largest denier _by far_.
Costs for basic services in the states are insanely high because the health insurance industry. If (for profit) hospitals charge insane rates, it pushes people into needing insurance no matter what. The insurance companies rake in insane profits, the hospitals charge insane rates and rake in insane profits, and people die because they can't afford something as simple as insulin, or an epi-pen.
Profit is not a bad word. Choosing (what I consider excessive) profits over letting people live, is a bad concept.
I'm rambling a bit here, and obviously my thoughts are scattered, but I just don't see a point where anyone needs "billions" in profit, when lives are at stake.
Murder is bad, but refusing to pay for life saving surgery/medicine is fine, is the message I take away from health insurance companies.