.
.
Last edited by Gweedo; 07-28-2010 at 10:47 AM.
yeah yeah...what else is new? still wont stop anyone from buying one.
Travel
ohhh what were we talking about
"BEYONDS OFFICIAL REALTOR"
Instagram @jordan_empirewest
Ranked #1 RE/MAX Professionals (2013-2022)
Ranked #2 RE/MAX Agent Calgary (2017-2020)
Ranked Top 100 Re/Max agent Western Canada (2013-2024)
Ranked #56 RE/MAX Agent Worldwide (2014)
Ranked Top 100 Re/Max Agent Canada (2013-2021)
Check out my mobile app
goagent.ca/98F1B2F9
some of the stuff in that post was false. thats enough to put me off of it.
Originally posted by Ben
yeah yeah...what else is new? still wont stop anyone from buying one.
most of that is common sense...heavier vehicle, usually shittier breaking distances...
and
Weighing up to 3 tons they increase wear and tear on road surfaces and bridgesmost of its the same thing, re said like 5 times...he height of SUV's makes them more prone to rollove
Thanks, Tips.
Welcome to 1980 when the Bronco II was around...
... and the early Jeep YJs with the flawed leaf spring shackles. We all saw that 20/20 report 20 years ago when we were kids.Originally posted by ZorroAMG
Thanks, Tips.
Welcome to 1980 when the Bronco II was around...
I am sure the manufacturers got the memo too.
mmmm, yeahh, trucks flipping? Okay. I'm gonna have to get you come in on SUNDAY.....thanks..Originally posted by sputnik
I am sure the manufacturers got the memo too.
You need to post your link here:
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/index.php
.
Last edited by Gweedo; 07-28-2010 at 10:47 AM.
my family has an SUV; and so do most of the families I know - it's not ALL status symbol (we drive a Toyota) - a lot of the folk have to carry around family and the 4x4 or AWD is an added bonus for Calgary roads in the winter.
granted that they are prone to rollovers, but yeesh... this could apply to almost any vehicle. "oh crxs are too light, shouldn't drive them cuz you could wipe out easily in winter"; "rwd cars are bad b/c they are prone to oversteer..."
as long as SUVs are a big seller in N.America, companies will keep selling them and ppl will keep buying them. big whoop; can't do anything to stop them. most ppl actually feel they are SAFER in an SUV than in a car. (my parents both bought the SUV for this very reason).
That's like trying to ban sports cars because they can go fast...
MOST IMPORTANTLY every time you get in a seat of a car or motorcycle (passenger or driver) you are putting your life at risk. I have ridden in an SUV pretty much every day for the past 5 or so years... no accidents or anything, just got the first fender bender in a parking lot two days ago...
If the driver is going faster because he's in a truck, he's a dumbass. That's got nothing to do with SUV design...
A lot of cars are driven as status symbols: limos, Bentleys, Maybachs, hell you see how many people overbadge their car (Type R I swear! ) to make it look 'special'... not just SUVs.
Big tires are always better for grip... you see the rear tires of any recent Lambo? Fookin HOOGE!
Those same grooves also evacuate water on wet roads, which is what you need. 1/8th of an inch wider grooves in a tire will not drastically affect handling... maybe on an F1 car but on an H2?
I don't see how you can build a window high up? You mean, like higher on the truck? Well, they go to the roof like most vehicles...
If you are tailgating someone so close that you can't see around them, back off idiot... And you can't see over other cars anyway unless you're in an SUV!
Figures for one state in one month in one year has nothing to do with general stats... just one bad month for SUV drivers I suppose.
A Maybach weighs friggin 120456 pounds, that doesn't stop it from doing well in handling tests...
BTW if you live in Florida or even NC here snow is kinda uncommon... if you live in Canada or NYC they come in rather handy!
Originally posted by VIZSLA
Seems that running qualifying in three heats worked so well we're now running the race in three parts too.
1, On the track
2, In the steward's box
3, In Paris
I don't know how an SUV flying over a guardrail is ideal in any case...?
An SUV flips after rolling over a low car... that's supposed to be dangerous? Oh really... never figgered...
Originally posted by VIZSLA
Seems that running qualifying in three heats worked so well we're now running the race in three parts too.
1, On the track
2, In the steward's box
3, In Paris
Originally posted by Gweedo
Whats my point? SUV drivers drive them mostly for status symbols.
Yes, my beat ass Land Rover is a status symbol. The pinnacle of fine british craftsmanship. Your Prelude is a fine example of utilitarian sensibility.
I don't tell you what to drive. So don't to me what to do with my money.
If I ever get into a crash, I'd rather be behind my 2 tonne bucket that your 1 tonne tin can. You might die, but I'll live.These drivers are putting the lives of other motorists at risk as well as their own.
fucking hippies
lol
Originally posted by Melinda
You certainly are not a very nice person though.
ha haOriginally posted by sputnik
... and the early Jeep YJs with the flawed leaf spring shackles. We all saw that 20/20 report 20 years ago when we were kids.
I am sure the manufacturers got the memo too.
i DO remember that 20/20
i dont mind SUV's, infact i plan to get the wife one in the future
what i hate is most SUV drivers
i hate the cocky fucks who speed in the winter time cutting off every other motorist cause they think they have the biggest balls on the road
Originally posted by Mibz
She's already exhibiting signs of turning into my Mom, I need some sort of legal recourse if a full-blown transformation occurs.
My dad autopsied a couple that rolled their Escalade at 20 miles an hour....seatbelted in and everything....statistically....down there...those full sized GM SUV's are brutal for their owners. There was a static collapse of 15 inches in the roof, I wouldnt play tennis with the pillars in those things!