low boost w/ med compression vs. high boost w/ low compression? - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: low boost w/ med compression vs. high boost w/ low compression?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    My Ride
    2008 Z06
    Rep Power

    Default low boost w/ med compression vs. high boost w/ low compression?

    Medium CR being 9.4 and Low being =< 8.8

    Low boost being 6lbs and high being 9lbs+

    Type 1 = low boost w/ med compression

    Type 2 = high boost w/ low compression
    The following is IMO only.

    So the main difference with these engine setups is going to be the way the power curve looks. Type 2 is probably going to be more rev-happy, where type 1 is probably going to be a better daily driver.

    Current Cars:
    1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
    1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
    2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile
    2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L Snow plow, dog hauler

    Past Cars:
    2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
    2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
    2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
    2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
    1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108
    1989 5L Mustang
    1990 Jeep Cherokee
    1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    My Ride
    '15 GTI
    Rep Power


    IMO 9lbs is not high boost, 9lbs can be run on factory internals given its not super high compression to begin with, however theres probably reliability issues

  3. #3
    Fuji's Avatar
    Fuji is offline Track Events Co-ordinator
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    My Ride
    Rep Power


    Hey! how about High Boost and High Compression! BOOM!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    My Ride
    2 x E Class Benz
    Rep Power


    With low compression motors, you have the ability to run high boost with low octane fuels (pump gas). High compression motors, you will need exotic fuels to run the same amount of boost. Shitty thing with low compression motors, is off boost, there is NO power/torque at all. It's a dog around town, and fuel economy drops (obviously).

    When you lower compression on a motor, you will need more boost to make the same power (less compression, less cylinder pressure). For example, a 11:1 compression motor at 6psi will make the same power as an identical motor but with 8:1 compression motor at 12psi (not exact numbers, but you get the idea). The 8:1 motor will be a dog when the turbo isn't spooled up though, and fuel economy will be worse, but it can make more power with the same octane fuel by allowing more boost before detonation.

    The secret is to find a good balance, like the 911 twin turbo, running mid compression (10:1 I think) and a maximum of 12psi. This will give excellent peak power with decent off boost torque as well.
    Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
    I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name

Similar Threads

  1. Good Audio Compression formats?

    By GTS Jeff in forum General
    Replies: 3
    Latest Threads: 11-28-2002, 05:11 PM
  2. Just got the Teg back from a compression test

    By Ekliptix in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 10
    Latest Threads: 09-14-2002, 10:30 PM
  3. what do you look for in a compression test?

    By 2000impreza in forum Mechanical
    Replies: 10
    Latest Threads: 08-20-2002, 03:04 PM
  4. Brake rotors... high and low quality??

    By homie in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 1
    Latest Threads: 07-13-2002, 03:54 PM
  5. AMG vs honda (on low boost!)

    By redline in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 6
    Latest Threads: 05-27-2002, 02:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts