In Defense Of Carfanman's Stance on Proofreading
I would like to present some evidence in support of Carfanman and his idea that spelling is not important. Therefore, proofreading is a waste of time...
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid.
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't
mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt
tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh and
I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt
Wlel, tehre you hvae it. Slpeling is not ipmorantt at all. So sopt wsatnig tmie porof raednig yuor pstos.
