1.6L = 100hp/L
1.8L = 0.94hp/L
2.2L = 0.91hp/L
??
I'm just curious about these engines, not other honda ones.
1.6L = 100hp/L
1.8L = 0.94hp/L
2.2L = 0.91hp/L
??
I'm just curious about these engines, not other honda ones.
Current Cars:
2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L
Past Cars:
1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
1989 5L Mustang
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda
More torque!
Machining, Fabricating, Welding etc.
right, so they have equivilant area under the curve/L?
Current Cars:
2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L
Past Cars:
1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
1989 5L Mustang
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda
just the way theyre tuned. they COULD be tuned for more hp but its less streetable
I'm just curious about these engines, not other honda ones.
^^^sorry, missed that the first time.
but specifically, WHICH 1.6, 1.8, and 2.2 is joo referring to?
i think it goes, higher the displacement, bigger the engine (obviously), harder to produce power, becomes less streetable as jeff said, more expensive to achieve same results etc. I mean look at motorcycle engines, 600cc = 100hp
Listen fam, she had a big rack of lamb
And they caused mad problems like math exams
Ask my man, her tits caused traffic jams
the only b16 that makes 100 hp/litre is the b16, which is a very good motor but has no (and I mean no) torque. Like jeff said, thats the way honda tuned them...price, streetability, usable hp range. (s2000 is pushing the limits of useable HP range in my opinion)
The lost hp is made up in tourqe. Usually the higher displacement engines have a lower red line, and steeper rod angle, a little more loss in power up high, so not as high HP. I read a really good thread on another board that went deep in to detail on this.. cant rember if it was a honda, or dsm fourm.. Ill go look tonight and see if i can find it again.
Originally posted by rage2
Just because you're older... doesn't mean you need older women. Nothing wrong with an 18 year old here and there!
Here;s some stuff ppl said:
Cost is the main issue. The bigger the engine, the higher it cost for it to stay at high rpm and make power. Design and material.
But when cost is not a factor.. just look at v8 ferrari engines.
Technically, because inertial loads increase at the square of RPM's.
I think the B16 is an oversquare engine(bore > stroke). This lets it rev more, and produce more power at those higher speeds.
The B18 is basically a stroked B16. It can't rev quite as much. Low end torque is probably a bit better because of the extra stroke, but the B18 can't rev enough to make up the difference.
The H22...I'm not sure about the bore vs. stroke. However, I do know that it can't rev quite as high as the other two engines. I think redline is 'only' about 7800rpm. So the H22 is the low end power king, and has a pretty good peak figure, in the 160lb-ft range. However, when you compare specific outputs(hp/liter), the H22 doesn't measure up, just because it couldn't make more power in proportion to it's size.
Current Cars:
2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L
Past Cars:
1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
1989 5L Mustang
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda