The 350Z would win. I've seen it, multiple times.
350z
5.0L
The 350Z would win. I've seen it, multiple times.
Another vote for the 350z.
http://www.dynoperformance.com/searc...408&safeid=408
^^ some info on a 350 if anyone cares. I think the 5.0 would win but I'm gonna find some information on it.
Last edited by 2.0turbo; 07-23-2005 at 01:07 PM.
1st number is 0-60 mph, second is quater mile.
1992 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 6.2 14.80
2005 Ford Mustang GT Convertible (5-speed Man) 5.0 13.70
2004 Infiniti G35 (6-speed Man.) 6.3 14.60
2004 Infiniti G35 6MT 5.9 14.20
2004 Nissan 350Z Conv. Touring 5.5 14.30
2003 Nissan 350Z Touring 5.7 14.30
Taken from: http://www.ssmoparmuscle.com/speedcomp.htm
I guess it depends on what Mustang your talking about. The older ones will get spanked, the newer ones won't. It looks to me that the 350 is a bit quicker from the line, but once the traction is there they hold the same through the gears.
Last edited by 2.0turbo; 07-23-2005 at 01:16 PM.
My numbers were for the 5.0L Cobra, not the LX. It'd help if the original poster states whether he was comparing the Cobra or the LX. All he said was "1993 5.0 Mustang."Originally posted by googe
the lx 5.0 isnt lighter, and its numbers are 205hp/270 torque. in the real world its always a drivers race for the most part, but technically speaking there is a clear winner.
Who races a stock 5.0L mustang?
Current Cars:
2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L
Past Cars:
1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
1989 5L Mustang
1990 Jeep Cherokee
1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda
sorry yeah a cobra
So a bone stock 93 mustang "cobra" which was just a body kit and decal package added. I still vote 350zOriginally posted by Z24_3.1
sorry yeah a cobra
What you're referring to are known as "canadian cobras". Basically just rebadged GT's. But in 1993 there actually was a Cobra produced in the states which was more than just a decals and body kit.Originally posted by jdmakkord
So a bone stock 93 mustang "cobra" which was just a body kit and decal package added. I still vote 350z
"She takes premium dude! PREMIUM!!! DUDE!!!!"
Yeah I know, but I guarantee it wasn't a real cobra he is talking about.Originally posted by NickGT
What you're referring to are known as "canadian cobras". Basically just rebadged GT's. But in 1993 there actually was a Cobra produced in the states which was more than just a decals and body kit.
There's a bone stock LX 5.0 in the world?? I doubt it.. Pull up along side a LX and if it sounds stock, there is probably a woman behind the wheel.
Secondly, the "bone stock" 93 Cobra sported these numbers on the 1/4 mile
Fabulous Mustangs & Exotic Fords, February 1993
. . . . .¼ mile: 14.05 @ 98 mph
But honestly, when you heard that Cobra fire up, even though the race would be close, i'd take the cobra in a heardbeat. Not to mention this was the first year they started the SVT line so it's a major collectors item.
350Z no doubt in the quarter stock for stock...
350Z definately.
The 350Z is a mid-14 car stock. Those 93 Mustang GT's were a mid-to-low 15 car stock. No contest.
Originally posted by modded46
But honestly, when you heard that Cobra fire up, even though the race would be close, i'd take the cobra in a heardbeat. Not to mention this was the first year they started the SVT line so it's a major collectors item.
i dont care what your numbers say and weight and all....i have driven both, a 350z and g35 coupe and 4 door, and have driven many 5.0l's. 350z and g35 felt the exact same. but every 5.0l is different some are fast as fuck some are slow ( these were all stock ). personally if you found a 5.0l with 0 km on it and raced it against the 350z, 5.0l would win. not because it is a crazy car but because the 350z and its brother g35 are not that fast. trust me
^^ thank u i dont know i think the mustang has more power
quater mile....... 5.0 > 350z
top speed......... 350z > 5.0
Originally posted by Moe Man
i dont care what your numbers say and weight and all....i have driven both, a 350z and g35 coupe and 4 door, and have driven many 5.0l's. 350z and g35 felt the exact same. but every 5.0l is different some are fast as fuck some are slow ( these were all stock ). personally if you found a 5.0l with 0 km on it and raced it against the 350z, 5.0l would win. not because it is a crazy car but because the 350z and its brother g35 are not that fast. trust me
Originally posted by MK3HKS
quater mile....... 5.0 > 350z
top speed......... 350z > 5.0
I like where you guys are coming from.
ya i dont think they where very good at getting cars to hit high speeds in 1993
The '93 Cobra only 5000 produced I think or less Will spank the 350Z. The '93 cobra had the entire GT-40 Package. Heads, Intake, and exhaust setup. Ford rated it at "245hp" but the number was very conservative. Also on a side note, the '93 For Cobra 'R' only 107 produced will basically make the 350 look like a pinto. Stock for stock of course
'93 cobra stock - High 13's good driver
'93 cobra 'R' - low 13's.
350Z 16 something at race city
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft