How are you guys voting when the vote comes in for this one Act two Associations policy?
This is a dated discussion on the topic from 2003.
"The Canadian accreditation system for engineering degrees is a model for the world. Why is it to be ignored by arguably the strongest association in the country? Since any four-year degree in any of several disciplines (including science, biology, geography, and presumably others) is acceptable for registration as an R.Eng., there is no real need to maintain any form of accreditation, or for students to endure the rigour of an engineering degree. Mr. Smyth indicates that CCPE has been consulted (in September 2003) on the “framework” of inclusivity. Does CCPE realize that, with the proposal now available in detail, inclusivity will void any need for a CEAB accredited degree for someone to practice as a (registered) engineer?"
http://www.engineering.ualberta.ca/news.cfm?story=28366