http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...s-winners.html
As always the glass is either half full or half empty.
I do see the side where the banks took on a 40 year mortgage at teaser rates - given to bums that had no intention of ever paying the full amount. Bum wins because he gets to live in a nice house for quite a few years, bank loses because they get a worthless house that they never even got rent-level money on.
But whos fault is that? The bank for being so gullible, or the borrower for pretending to be "all that".