Quantcast
Why do higher displacment Dohc Vtec engines have less hp/L then those w/ less disp.? - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Why do higher displacment Dohc Vtec engines have less hp/L then those w/ less disp.?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2008 Z06
    Posts
    3,594
    Rep Power
    42

    Default Why do higher displacment Dohc Vtec engines have less hp/L then those w/ less disp.?

    1.6L = 100hp/L
    1.8L = 0.94hp/L
    2.2L = 0.91hp/L

    ??
    I'm just curious about these engines, not other honda ones.
    Current Cars:
    2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
    1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
    2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L

    Past Cars:
    1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
    2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
    2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
    2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
    2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
    2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
    1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
    1989 5L Mustang
    1990 Jeep Cherokee
    1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    6.7 CUMMINS, E50 AMG
    Posts
    4,820
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    More torque!
    Machining, Fabricating, Welding etc.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2008 Z06
    Posts
    3,594
    Rep Power
    42

    Default

    right, so they have equivilant area under the curve/L?
    Current Cars:
    2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
    1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
    2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L

    Past Cars:
    1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
    2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
    2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
    2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
    2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
    2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
    1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
    1989 5L Mustang
    1990 Jeep Cherokee
    1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    oreo cookie
    My Ride
    a wrx.
    Posts
    8,031
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    just the way theyre tuned. they COULD be tuned for more hp but its less streetable

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    My Ride
    F355 GTB-Fiero GT-Civic Si-Champ Car-300ZX
    Posts
    310
    Rep Power
    22

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Arizona
    My Ride
    F355 GTB-Fiero GT-Civic Si-Champ Car-300ZX
    Posts
    310
    Rep Power
    22

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    oreo cookie
    My Ride
    a wrx.
    Posts
    8,031
    Rep Power
    31

    Default

    but specifically, WHICH 1.6, 1.8, and 2.2 is joo referring to?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    My Ride
    X3 3.0, CLK500, FZR600
    Posts
    448
    Rep Power
    22

    Default

    i think it goes, higher the displacement, bigger the engine (obviously), harder to produce power, becomes less streetable as jeff said, more expensive to achieve same results etc. I mean look at motorcycle engines, 600cc = 100hp
    Listen fam, she had a big rack of lamb
    And they caused mad problems like math exams
    Ask my man, her tits caused traffic jams

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    WAO Arrival
    Posts
    1,274
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    the only b16 that makes 100 hp/litre is the b16, which is a very good motor but has no (and I mean no) torque. Like jeff said, thats the way honda tuned them...price, streetability, usable hp range. (s2000 is pushing the limits of useable HP range in my opinion)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    '07 Ranger FX4 Level II
    Posts
    1,557
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    The lost hp is made up in tourqe. Usually the higher displacement engines have a lower red line, and steeper rod angle, a little more loss in power up high, so not as high HP. I read a really good thread on another board that went deep in to detail on this.. cant rember if it was a honda, or dsm fourm.. Ill go look tonight and see if i can find it again.
    Originally posted by rage2

    Just because you're older... doesn't mean you need older women. Nothing wrong with an 18 year old here and there!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2008 Z06
    Posts
    3,594
    Rep Power
    42

    Default

    Here;s some stuff ppl said:

    Cost is the main issue. The bigger the engine, the higher it cost for it to stay at high rpm and make power. Design and material.
    But when cost is not a factor.. just look at v8 ferrari engines.


    Technically, because inertial loads increase at the square of RPM's.


    I think the B16 is an oversquare engine(bore > stroke). This lets it rev more, and produce more power at those higher speeds.

    The B18 is basically a stroked B16. It can't rev quite as much. Low end torque is probably a bit better because of the extra stroke, but the B18 can't rev enough to make up the difference.

    The H22...I'm not sure about the bore vs. stroke. However, I do know that it can't rev quite as high as the other two engines. I think redline is 'only' about 7800rpm. So the H22 is the low end power king, and has a pretty good peak figure, in the 160lb-ft range. However, when you compare specific outputs(hp/liter), the H22 doesn't measure up, just because it couldn't make more power in proportion to it's size.
    Current Cars:
    2019 BMW X3 M40i Stage 2, 12.44 at 110mph
    1972 Chevy Super Cheyenne C10 Pickup 402 big block, 700R4
    2004 GMC 2500HD 8.1L

    Past Cars:
    1970 Chevy Blazer, 2wd
    2003 BMW X5 4.6IS Doushmobile, moneypit
    2015 Ford Fiesta ST | Cobb Stage 1, catless downpipe
    2008 Corvette Z06 - 11.39 at 123.8mph
    2002 Corvette Z06 - 12.10 at 116.5mph
    2005 Jeep Wrangler LJ
    1993 5L Mustang - 12.59 at 108mph
    1989 5L Mustang
    1990 Jeep Cherokee
    1991 Acura Integra RS 403Honda

Similar Threads

  1. DOHC VTEC Head - Does it Bolt Up?

    By Weapon_R in forum Performance Modifications
    Replies: 9
    Latest Threads: 02-24-2003, 11:20 AM
  2. Exclusive: Faster Video trailer (higher-res)

    By 600cc's in forum Cars, Bikes, Machines
    Replies: 14
    Latest Threads: 11-06-2002, 03:13 PM
  3. B16 DOHC Vtec - worth it?

    By Weapon_R in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 24
    Latest Threads: 10-16-2002, 08:43 PM
  4. To All Those Who Have Sold A Car *IMPORTANT*

    By Weapon_R in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 27
    Latest Threads: 10-09-2002, 04:25 PM
  5. Hyundais have less hp than advertised

    By Ferio_vti in forum General Car/Bike Talk
    Replies: 15
    Latest Threads: 09-14-2002, 10:57 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •