2014 Nissan Rogue

[jonnycat]

They definitely couldn't have made it worse, but I am shocked (on paper) on how much better they have made this. It looks bigger but I am sure it can't be too big, as the pathfinder isn't really that big.

Anyways another choice for your suv dollars.

http://www.nissanusa.com/crossovers/2014-rogue/

[B69]

I agree this is sharper. I'm not sure how 7 people would fit into this vehicle haha. I'm sure the deals on the 2013's are good right now!

[jampack]

My wife and I just thought of getting an SUV as we have our first baby coming! This could be the one!

[schocker]

I read they were keeping the original rogue around for a big, not sure if that is US only or not. Looks nicer than the current though for sure

[JustinMCS]

Looks like an rx350 previous gen mixed with a new Ford escape

[corsvette]

Wonder if the Rogue's CVT transmission is the same one thats blowing up in the new gen Pathfinders.

If you buy a Nissan get the extended warranty!

[msommers]

My buddy had a Rogue and the tranny shit the bed just after 100,000kms - most of it was highway km's too. I would not want to touch this thing.

[heavyD]

CVT's suck. I hate how manufacturers are shoving them down our throat in their desperations to increase fuel economy. They simply aren't durable enough at the present time. I believe Nissan warranties these transmissions for 200,000 km's so people will still buy them knowing that the inevitable replacement will be covered.

[Xtrema]

Originally posted by B69
I agree this is sharper. I'm not sure how 7 people would fit into this vehicle haha. I'm sure the deals on the 2013's are good right now!

Looks like 3rd row options = no spare and do run flats.

I doubt this will be a popular option on the Rogue.

If you want usable 3rd row, get Pathfinder.

Originally posted by heavyD
CVT's suck. I hate how manufacturers are shoving them down our throat in their desperations to increase fuel economy. They simply aren't durable enough at the present time. I believe Nissan warranties these transmissions for 200,000 km's so people will still buy them knowing that the inevitable replacement will be covered.

But doesn't that only cover 2003-2010?

[heavyD]

Originally posted by Xtrema


But doesn't that only cover 2003-2010?

Not sure but if that's the case why would anyone buy one of their CVT equipped vehicles knowing their history? Some Murano owners were getting their transmissions replaced yearly.