Its an evaded truth, that we must start to refine more and more here.
Good news, this state of the art facility is more than welcome!
http://albertaenergyplus.ca/benefits/time-to-diversify/
Its an evaded truth, that we must start to refine more and more here.
Good news, this state of the art facility is more than welcome!
http://albertaenergyplus.ca/benefits/time-to-diversify/
Too bad that a lot of people won't see your post because they have you on their ignore list - their loss I guess.
Will fuck off, again.
Threads still show up, even if the OP is on ignore.Originally posted by speedog
Too bad that a lot of people won't see your post because they have you on their ignore list - their loss I guess.
lol...the crack heads? They still read it, if for no other reason than to brag the quote "Toma is on your ignore list" lolOriginally posted by speedog
Too bad that a lot of people won't see your post because they have you on their ignore list - their loss I guess.
...
Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-14-2019 at 01:26 PM.
Toma just a heads up this refinery was in the cards much before NDP rule.
But yes agreed, let's refine more here too!
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age."
-H.P. Lovecraft
Diesel though. Flood the market with it means cheaper delivery costs for all products. Would also mean it might be worth the extra expense of getting a diesel car/truck.Originally posted by Sugarphreak
So being that Canada currently produces all of our own fuel anyway... and we cannot export it to the United States. Basically this will flood the Western market with more fuel than we need, which should drive down the cost at the pump, but will ultimately boost consumption?
Can't say I am really for, or against it; while cheaper fuel is always nice, it will negatively affect peoples choice on buying fuel efficient cars, and R&D for green technology.
Kind of a weird thing for Toma to support
Yeah, I understand we've pulled the plug on a few....Originally posted by Darkane
Toma just a heads up this refinery was in the cards much before NDP rule.
But yes agreed, let's refine more here too!
If that's truly the case, then why does our diesel price spike in the winter when its always written off as US heating oil going through the roof out east?Originally posted by Sugarphreak
So being that Canada currently produces all of our own fuel anyway...
If we produce enough of our own diesel, then I wouldn't think this to be the case. This exact reason I've mentioned is part of the financial sustainability for the NW refinery, that being diesel is very profitable
Think of all those extra GHGs getting discharged into the air!
...
Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-14-2019 at 01:26 PM.
From another article.Originally posted by Sugarphreak
I know fuel products for vehicles are all made in Canada, however I am not sure if heating oil is produced here exclusively as well (which is basically diesel)
Also, I am a bit confused about how they can have a diesel only refinery. You cannot just convert crude into diesel, there are lighter and heavier products that come out of that process.
The refinery will produce ultra low-sulphur diesel fuel and other products including naphtha and diluent.
Pump prices go down? Impossible.Originally posted by Sugarphreak
Basically this will flood the Western market with more fuel than we need, which should drive down the cost at the pump
As noted, there will be other products that are also valuable. That said, you most certainly can tailor the process to be biased towards producing certain products... within reasonable limits, and also of course taking into account the financials of doing so.Originally posted by Sugarphreak
You cannot just convert crude into diesel, there are lighter and heavier products that come out of that process.
But I agree with Roopi, we are at $40/barrel oil and prices are still at $1.05/L for regular gas. The oil companies will get their profits one way or another! But of course, there isn't an oligopoly and anti-competitive practices going on, nope!
edit: Looks like I take too long to reply. ^^^Some good info above me.
yeah, initial approval was back in 2007. So about 10years from start to finish (ignoring all the pre-approval time wasted/sigh)Originally posted by Darkane
Toma just a heads up this refinery was in the cards much before NDP rule.
But yes agreed, let's refine more here too!
'A couple products being produced. (LPG/UCO/ULSD, etc)Originally posted by Sugarphreak
<snip>
Also, I am a bit confused about how they can have a diesel only refinery. You cannot just convert crude into diesel, there are lighter and heavier products that come out of that process.
ULSD is targeted though (about 50%)
you can view some of the details in the application package. It also might mention some gasification details/CO2 recovery. (I didn't check)
http://www.nwrpartnership.com/public-notice
around page ..4 is the mass balance
Last edited by Gart; 08-11-2015 at 03:15 PM.
Signatures are dumb..
If this is a government operation that doesn't generate profits. I can see it driving down prices.Originally posted by roopi
Pump prices go down? Impossible.
Just like how the big 3 telecoms can offer cheap cell plans wherever a government telecom is operating in the region.
WOW.....wow to this thread. Wow to how dumb TOMA is. Aliens are going to be attacking soon watch out dumbassOriginally posted by Xtrema
If this is a government operation that doesn't generate profits. I can see it driving down prices.
Just like how the big 3 telecoms can offer cheap cell plans wherever a government telecom is operating in the region.
Tell us more why this is a bad thing rather than resorting to name calling.Originally posted by Milk2%
WOW.....wow to this thread. Wow to how dumb TOMA is. Aliens are going to be attacking soon watch out dumbass
We all know from a profit/operation cost angle that it will be more than likely negative. But most government projects' benefit is usually hard to measure anyway.
Like how do you measure the economic impact of good flowing highways? Or a great water treatment system? Or irrigation systems?
There are other projects that private sector won't touch. I think refineries is one of them because it's a loser fiscally but may become a greater good.
just more cars on the road, to allow for checkstops, that cause accidents and ultimately DEATH, that is the result of the NDP supporting more refineries
Not sure how anyone thinks it's a good thing to use tax dollars to support the construction of a refinery that no profit-seeking business would want to undertake.
I get that having a diversified tax base makes sense, but spending tax money to make tax money seems insane.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote