The Honda Passport was based on the Isuzu Rodeo. There was an older Acura SUV based on the Isuzu Trooper. I mixed up the name and called it an MDX earlier, it was actually an Acura SLX.
My bad
The Honda Passport was based on the Isuzu Rodeo. There was an older Acura SUV based on the Isuzu Trooper. I mixed up the name and called it an MDX earlier, it was actually an Acura SLX.
My bad
Last edited by HRD2PLZ; 07-18-2002 at 02:55 PM.
The 2nd Gen CRV engine put out 146HP, and a whopping 130lb/ft of torque, we have one, its nothing special for power.Originally posted by redline
think the first CRV engine were 127hp and the later one were 140hp but with lots of torque. It is a good engine for FI or vtec head swaps.
the mdx is 265 on the '04 fyi and of course it can be done but who knows
130lb/ft of torque is gobs for a honda
Way to be on the ball bud. Where the hell were you 2 years ago? This entire time I've been telling people that the CRV only had 140hp...Originally posted by Jeevin
The 2nd Gen CRV engine put out 146HP, and a whopping 130lb/ft of torque, we have one, its nothing special for power.
You start with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.
wow, this was back when i pretended to care about hondas hehe
Originally posted by redline
think the first CRV engine were 127hp and the later one were 140hp but with lots of torque. It is a good engine for FI or vtec head swaps.nothing wrong with reading old threads...just correcting your error...in case someone else wants to know a 6HP difference...haha but the real correction was when he said there was a lot of torque...130lb/ft is not exciting.Originally posted by 5.9 R/T
Way to be on the ball bud. Where the hell were you 2 years ago? This entire time I've been telling people that the CRV only had 140hp...
Last edited by Jeevin; 09-14-2004 at 10:15 PM.
Originally posted by canadiandaytona
130lb/ft of torque is gobs for a honda
sig deleted by moderator, because they are useless
except for the fact that noone gives a fuck about them anymore.Originally posted by Jeevin
nothing wrong with reading old threads...just correcting your error...in case someone else wants to know a 6HP difference...haha but the real correction was when he said there was a lot of torque...130lb/ft is not exciting.
Except me, and obviously you for replying and reading this thread.
hes just pointing out to u that its pretty annoying to everyone when some noob comes out bumping really old threads. to help everyone out, try to keep this simple rule in mind when posting:Originally posted by Jeevin
Except me, and obviously you for replying and reading this thread.
"dont bump a thread thats more than a week old unless its for something that people will care about."
happy posting! welcome to the intarweb!