Quantcast
Foreign home owners in Vancouver just got hit with a whopper! - Page 2 - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 174

Thread: Foreign home owners in Vancouver just got hit with a whopper!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    YWG
    Posts
    3,119
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Originally posted by GQBalla
    Personally, I don't think this will change anything.


    House prices won't drop. Demand won't drop.

    All that will change is that the government will have a bit of extra money.

    If you want things to change the hike has to happen at the property tax level where foreign owners get heavily taxed year after year.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    65
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Originally posted by sputnik




    House prices won't drop. Demand won't drop.

    All that will change is that the government will have a bit of extra money.

    If you want things to change the hike has to happen at the property tax level where foreign owners get heavily taxed year after year.
    I think even at the property tax level, it wouldn't really do anything. I have no clue how much property taxes in van are, but when people are dropping $2MM on houses and picking up condo's at 10-15% above list price, I don't think even a 100% increase in yearly property taxes is going to deter them.

    And besides, there are a lot of individuals who take advantage of the immigrant investment program where buy in is 800k. If anything, this 15% tax is a massive discount for foreigners who don't want to use the IIP.

    This is a step in the right direction but i think if BC wants to stop this bubble they have to eliminate foreign property purchases all together.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    6,852
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-15-2019 at 11:23 PM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    2,093
    Rep Power
    44

    Default

    Originally posted by hks


    I think even at the property tax level, it wouldn't really do anything. I have no clue how much property taxes in van are, but when people are dropping $2MM on houses and picking up condo's at 10-15% above list price, I don't think even a 100% increase in yearly property taxes is going to deter them.

    And besides, there are a lot of individuals who take advantage of the immigrant investment program where buy in is 800k. If anything, this 15% tax is a massive discount for foreigners who don't want to use the IIP.

    This is a step in the right direction but i think if BC wants to stop this bubble they have to eliminate foreign property purchases all together.
    it would have to be something significant like 15% of value per year if left unoccupied... not increase the regular tax structure for those that are actually occupying it.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South of Calgary
    My Ride
    is broken
    Posts
    794
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Originally posted by atgilchrist
    That's accounted for. The residency of ownership of the company's shares is considered.
    Do you have any proof of this? What percentage can be foreign investment before they are considered for this tax?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    My Ride
    Bicycle
    Posts
    9,279
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Originally posted by hks


    I think even at the property tax level, it wouldn't really do anything. I have no clue how much property taxes in van are, but when people are dropping $2MM on houses and picking up condo's at 10-15% above list price, I don't think even a 100% increase in yearly property taxes is going to deter them.

    And besides, there are a lot of individuals who take advantage of the immigrant investment program where buy in is 800k. If anything, this 15% tax is a massive discount for foreigners who don't want to use the IIP.

    This is a step in the right direction but i think if BC wants to stop this bubble they have to eliminate foreign property purchases all together.
    Vancouver tax is cheaper than Calgary's

    $1M value only has to pay $3200.

    http://vancouver.ca/home-property-de...sidential.aspx

    I don't know why the city is actually lowering taxes.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    6,852
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-15-2019 at 11:23 PM.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    CLK 55 / 2g Eclipse / EP3
    Posts
    4,422
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Originally posted by atgilchrist
    That's accounted for. The residency of ownership of the company's shares is considered.
    You have to understand that there are layers upon layers of corporations setup for all this. Front companies setup by locals to handle the business end, virtual offices, etc.

    No way this will affect the larger setups. Perhaps the occasional millionaire though (not billionaire).

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Kelowna
    Posts
    734
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Originally posted by jacky4566


    Do you have any proof of this? What percentage can be foreign investment before they are considered for this tax?
    Government release says: "foreign corporations include incorporated in Canada, but controlled in whole or in part by a foreign national or other foreign corporation..."

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    6,852
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-15-2019 at 11:23 PM.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    YYC
    My Ride
    1 x E Class Benz
    Posts
    23,609
    Rep Power
    101

    Default

    Originally posted by Xtrema
    Vancouver tax is cheaper than Calgary's

    $1M value only has to pay $3200.

    http://vancouver.ca/home-property-de...sidential.aspx

    I don't know why the city is actually lowering taxes.
    You can't look at it that way as Vancouver prices are way higher than ours. $1M gets you a small condo in Van, so you have to look at it from the perspective that you're paying $3200 in taxes for a small condo versus say $2000 in Calgary.
    Originally posted by SEANBANERJEE
    I have gone above and beyond what I should rightfully have to do to protect my good name

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    My Ride
    Bicycle
    Posts
    9,279
    Rep Power
    49

    Default

    Originally posted by rage2

    You can't look at it that way as Vancouver prices are way higher than ours. $1M gets you a small condo in Van, so you have to look at it from the perspective that you're paying $3200 in taxes for a small condo versus say $2000 in Calgary.
    $800K will get me 900+sqft near water. But yeah, to get the same foot print in Calgary as Van, it'll be $2.5M and paying $7500 in taxes.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    ute
    Posts
    4,939
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    I find the whole concern a bit bizarre, to be honest.

    If property values are so high, then development is encouraged, and supply should increase to reflect demand. This assumes people are smart enough to understand that renting can be smarter than buying.

    The market should still be capable of solving this problem without government intervention. (Although gov't intervention in the form of interest rates etc is unavoidable I guess).

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    2GR-FE Hethel, 14W246, 13W251, 06NC, 02Aerio
    Posts
    867
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    ^ There is no more land in central Vancouver = no more excess supply.
    Insurance Pro

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    alberta
    Posts
    328
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    I read it's a $100-$200k fine for anyone trying to get around this foreign investment legislation. The penalty on top of the transfer fee is crazy high.. Perhaps enough to deter people from trying to skirt around the laws.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    2015 CLS63s AMG Coupe
    Posts
    676
    Rep Power
    17

    Default

    Originally posted by Buster
    I find the whole concern a bit bizarre, to be honest.

    If property values are so high, then development is encouraged, and supply should increase to reflect demand. This assumes people are smart enough to understand that renting can be smarter than buying.

    The market should still be capable of solving this problem without government intervention. (Although gov't intervention in the form of interest rates etc is unavoidable I guess).

    Originally posted by guessboi
    ^ There is no more land in central Vancouver = no more excess supply.

    Just to chime in... Developments are being planned and going up everywhere. Not sure about single family homes, but condo developments are going up everywhere.

    Last two trips I've been out there I was on a little "development tour". Being used to the slow pace of Calgary, I was pretty surprised.
    Sig was pwned by Moderator!

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    ute
    Posts
    4,939
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Originally posted by guessboi
    ^ There is no more land in central Vancouver = no more excess supply.
    That's one of the silliest myths I see regularly perpetuated in the Vancity RE market.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    CLK 55 / 2g Eclipse / EP3
    Posts
    4,422
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Originally posted by guessboi
    ^ There is no more VIRGIN, UNTOUCHED land in METRO Vancouver = no more excess supply.
    Fixed - I think this is what you mean.

    Between the industrial parks giving way to condos, old RR corridors etc, there is much for RE development and tear downs of course.
    Last edited by revelations; 07-26-2016 at 10:40 PM.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    calgary
    My Ride
    CLK 55 / 2g Eclipse / EP3
    Posts
    4,422
    Rep Power
    23

    Default

    Originally posted by atgilchrist


    Government release says: "foreign corporations include incorporated in Canada, but controlled in whole or in part by a foreign national or other foreign corporation..."
    So then I (as a rich foreigner) just setup another holding company based out of Vancouver, that manages the original one, or put a relative who is a naturalized citizen as a majority shareholder.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nowhere
    Posts
    6,852
    Rep Power
    27

    Default

    ...
    Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-15-2019 at 11:23 PM.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. National Whopper Day $1.69 Whoppers

    By CKY in forum Food and Dining
    Replies: 33
    Latest Threads: 06-07-2010, 08:24 AM
  2. Burger King: Delete 10 Facebook Friends, Get Free Whopper

    By Zephyr in forum Society / Law / Current Events / Politics
    Replies: 25
    Latest Threads: 01-16-2009, 08:35 PM
  3. SNL Whopper Virgins

    By 01RedDX in forum Entertainment
    Replies: 9
    Latest Threads: 01-13-2009, 09:54 AM
  4. The Angry Whopper

    By DannyO in forum Food and Dining
    Replies: 13
    Latest Threads: 12-22-2008, 07:58 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Latest Threads: 07-20-2003, 10:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •