Quantcast
Calgary real estate prospects - Page 363 - Beyond.ca - Car Forums
Page 363 of 363 FirstFirst ... 353 362 363
Results 7,241 to 7,247 of 7247

Thread: Calgary real estate prospects

  1. #7241
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Chinatown
    My Ride
    NC1
    Posts
    10,852
    Rep Power
    87

    Default

    So generous
    I’m also waiting for that gift from my parents lol
    Originally posted by rage2
    Shit, there's only 49 users here, I doubt we'll even break 100
    I am user #49

  2. #7242
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    My Ride
    Ford F150
    Posts
    482
    Rep Power
    18

    Default

    Looking at any inflation adjusted chart of median detached prices and median salary across Canada for the last few decades makes me believe that no real "crash" has ever happened in our lifetimes.

    It definitely went flat for along period of time, which allowed ma y to catch up in income, but median wages didn't catch up with those people.
    I can eat more hot wings than you.

  3. #7243
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    ute
    Posts
    4,939
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89coupe View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think we would need 2% interest rates again but I’m not sure that is going to happen anytime soon.

    I would say 95% of new homes are built below average. Highly recommend a good home inspector if buying pre existing or building. I’m terrified of all the new infills and renovated homes that are hitting the market.

    If you want to be entertained, follow Nook & Cranny homes on Tik Tok

    Marty is hilarious.

    Thankfully for my kids we will be able to give them real estate, the younger generations need that edge to get ahead now.
    You are arguing against your own claim in this post.

    Home values are a function of economics. If younger people can't afford homes, then eventually the equity in the boomer generation of homes will be liquidated. High home prices is another way of saying pent-up and immobile capital is embedded within the home market. That capital is unproductive capital - it is providing no utility. Eventually, the economy will right itself and there will be pressure to release that capital (or certainly less pressure to keep it there).

    As for prices...you need to compare inflation adjusted values now and in the future.

  4. #7244
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Homeless
    My Ride
    Blue Dabadee
    Posts
    9,688
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Yea while I think it’s nominally unlikely that face value prices drop much.

    I think our currency is going to end up so far in the toilet that that will be the mechanism of devaluation.
    Originally posted by Thales of Miletus

    If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
    Originally posted by Toma
    fact.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yolobimmer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    guessing who I might be, psychologizing me with your non existent degree.

  5. #7245
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB Canada
    My Ride
    M5 Competition
    Posts
    3,159
    Rep Power
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buster View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You are arguing against your own claim in this post.

    Home values are a function of economics. If younger people can't afford homes, then eventually the equity in the boomer generation of homes will be liquidated. High home prices is another way of saying pent-up and immobile capital is embedded within the home market. That capital is unproductive capital - it is providing no utility. Eventually, the economy will right itself and there will be pressure to release that capital (or certainly less pressure to keep it there).

    As for prices...you need to compare inflation adjusted values now and in the future.

    Liquidated for sure, to who, developers. The cycle continues. Young people won’t be buying a run down shit box. The boomer
    generation is already liquidating, their 1950’s bungalow that they paid $40k for, now selling for $800-1M, the home is unliveable in most cases but the land is incredibly valuable.

    The Gen X era is next, we are all close to retirement, some already retired. Our values haven’t increased near as much depending on when you bought, if I held on to my first home that was built in 1999 it cost me $224k, current value around $750-859k

    The wealth gained is less and less it seems unless you are able to inherit.

  6. #7246
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Homeless
    My Ride
    Blue Dabadee
    Posts
    9,688
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    So if corporations aren’t going to be allowed to own SFH’s.

    Isn’t that going to implode the whole buy, tear down, rebuild infill business model?
    Originally posted by Thales of Miletus

    If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
    Originally posted by Toma
    fact.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yolobimmer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    guessing who I might be, psychologizing me with your non existent degree.

  7. #7247
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    My Ride
    ute
    Posts
    4,939
    Rep Power
    100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 89coupe View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Liquidated for sure, to who, developers. The cycle continues. Young people won’t be buying a run down shit box. The boomer
    generation is already liquidating, their 1950’s bungalow that they paid $40k for, now selling for $800-1M, the home is unliveable in most cases but the land is incredibly valuable.

    The Gen X era is next, we are all close to retirement, some already retired. Our values haven’t increased near as much depending on when you bought, if I held on to my first home that was built in 1999 it cost me $224k, current value around $750-859k

    The wealth gained is less and less it seems unless you are able to inherit.
    There are numerous economic factors at play here that you are not considering. Primarily, the interest of the Millennials and the GenZs to continue to prop up the boomer balance sheets (ie their home equity). They won't. The GenXers have been dumb enough to think they can still win the ponzi. But there is far less interest among the following generations to continue that ponzi.

    That isn't just for home equity, it is also for entitlements, golden healthcare systems, public pensions, etc.

    Why do you think the GenZs are turning against Trudeau so decisively. They know the current economic structure is unsustainable...and that includes the artificial storage of economic capital/capacity in their elder's home equity.
    Last edited by Buster; Today at 04:52 PM.

Page 363 of 363 FirstFirst ... 353 362 363

Similar Threads

  1. FREE: 2 tickets to the NHL/CHL Top Prospects Game (Jan 15)

    By toyboy88 in forum Event Tickets / Attraction Passes
    Replies: 1
    Latest Threads: 01-14-2014, 05:11 PM
  2. Honeymoon Prospects

    By statick in forum Travel and Vacation
    Replies: 17
    Latest Threads: 03-19-2012, 11:05 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Latest Threads: 04-21-2010, 02:54 AM
  4. Anyone worried about real estate declining in Calgary?

    By urban.one in forum Real Estate / Finance
    Replies: 50
    Latest Threads: 04-26-2007, 11:11 AM
  5. Edmonton Real Estate Market vs. CAlgary

    By 2.2vtec in forum General
    Replies: 11
    Latest Threads: 02-21-2006, 02:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •