Orrrr... The dog would not give him the attention he desired no matter how much peanut butter was applied and now he has never forgiven the species as a wholeThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Orrrr... The dog would not give him the attention he desired no matter how much peanut butter was applied and now he has never forgiven the species as a wholeThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
that'll teach em"Further evaluation of this file is ongoing to determine if further action is warranted, including the possible application of a vicious or nuisance dog designation."
Tap, Rack, BANG!
I was just thinking this was probably the most likely scenario. Its instilled a deeply rooted hatred for both dogs and peanut butter.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteOriginally Posted by SugarphreakThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Well dogs of a particular breed are fairly inbred at this point, so I'm sure there's a genetic connection.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's definitely not a numbers game. A Shitzu is more likely to bite/attack, but if it does, I'll boot it clear out of our atmosphere, not report it, and move on with my day. If it's a Pitbull, I'll have a legit fight on my hands to at a minimum not be disfigured for life.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Fucking rear naked choke FTW.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I realize getting naked first is wasting precious moments, but it does make for a better story.
Last edited by Misterman; 03-08-2024 at 07:26 PM.
https://www.tps.ca/media-centre/news-releases/59147/
Dog people. The gift that keeps on giving.
Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to identify the breed, but I guess someone should get a dna sample from the child’s wounds to be sure before we jump to any conclusions.
Last edited by killramos; 03-24-2024 at 12:33 PM.
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Fucking hell. She should get charged with aggravated assault for that at least
What's the equivalent of "hit and run" for this situation? Fleeing the scene or something?
- - - Updated - - -
Failure to render aid?
- - - Updated - - -
Also, fucking hell we really do need a MEGA thread.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You just don't understand the breed.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by SJW
Once again another useless post by JRSCOOLDUDE.
Originally posted by snowcat
Don't let the e-thugs and faggots get to you when they quote your posts and write stupid shit.^^ Fact CheckedOriginally posted by JRSC00LUDE
I say stupid shit all the time.
There are no dangerous dogs.
Just dangerous owners.
fuck thats brutal. I wonder if life altering injuries means the child lost an eye or something. Owner should get punished accordingly.
Tap, Rack, BANG!
Yeah I assume bad scarring. Facial scars, etc.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They should make the owner put the dog down. Maybe if they did this, people would think twice about going out and getting another one.
That would be a pretty light sentence. There's lots more dogs out there. Dog put down, owner cannot have another is a starting place. Actual criminal charges should be a possibility.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Just put the owner down too.
I can eat more hot wings than you.
I meant literally make the owner take it behind the barn and shoot it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But yes, they should 100% be prohibited from owning more dogs, and be charged criminally.
#oldyeller
https://www.cp24.com/news/woman-arre...ound-1.6820793
Slap on the wrist incoming, I’m guessing criminal negligence charge goes away with a plea to the bylaw offences.Toronto resident Patrycja Siarek, 38, has been charged with one count of criminal negligence causing bodily harm. She is also facing one count of failing to muzzle a dangerous dog and one count of allowing a dog to run at large under the municipal code, along with two additional charges under the Dog Owner's Liability Act.
The charges have not been tested in court. Siarek is scheduled to make her first court appearance at the Ontario Court of Justice on Monday.
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Any pics of the owner?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote