That’s a loooong time.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That’s a loooong time.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Originally posted by Thales of Miletus
If you think I have been trying to present myself as intellectually superior, then you truly are a dimwit.
Originally posted by Toma
fact.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
again, never with a clause.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If space vehicles were never invented, we would not have GPS. Instead, we would likely have some highly accurate LORAN-type setup for the cities and a low accuracy LORAN-type system around the globe in less populated areas.
Ohhhh snap!!!!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.thedrive.com/news/31761/...all-time-highsThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I thought farmers were using old tech because the ownership costs are way lower? Certain systems/etc. are blocked from access entirely.
Or something.
And I bet you that fully autonomous cars are on Calgary's roads by 2035.
Coming in hot!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Yes, the farmers are going to old tech for various reasons - access blocked, subscription based pricing, cant perform maintenance in many cases without the dealers approval etc. There is a whole secondary market in the US for these tractor PC (computers) that have been hacked and modded.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I agree that in 15 years, its likely that someone will have stepped up to the smart road game - after seeing the sales potential. Perhaps install radar reflective cat-eyes, dug into the road like in BC so they dont come out in the winter. Thats where a user based road tax is also likely.
Farmers are buying old tech due to manufacturers fighting the right to repair movement. Farmers are no longer allowed to fix their own machinery or access the computers. Manufacturers have contracts when selling the equipment that they are only licensing the software in the machine to the current owner, and without that licence, the equipment won't operate. If you mess with the software, it bricks itself, and then the manufacturer will charge exorbitant amounts to fix it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Boosted life tip #329
Girlfriends cost money
Turbos cost money
Both make whining noises
Make the smart choice.
Originally posted by Mibz
Always a fucking awful experience seeing spikers. Extra awful when he laps me.
Hey, hey. I maybe have one foot in the grave but not both yet although that 7th decade is looming large now.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Fun fact: @speedog discovered 'hot'This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Mercedes will likely end up owning a controlling shareholding in Aston Martin in the next ten years, without even paying for it.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://karenable.com/aston-martins-...-2020-results/
^The link is "KarenAble"?
At first glance, that makes it sound like it's the official news source for Karens.
LoL
Unfortunate development. Site was set up and named long before the "Karen" thing emerged.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I did think of renaming it but that would be another major undertaking.
My Aston Martin Vantage was half-AMG anyway, it's only fair that it's the same case in F1.